The 5-item Modified Frailty Index is a simple and clinically useful tool for identifying older head and neck cancer patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes following major surgery.
Abstract
Objective
Frailty is a recognized risk factor for poor surgical outcomes, particularly in the elderly. This study evaluates the predictive value of the 5-item Modified Frailty Index in patients aged 70 and older undergoing head and neck cancer resection with microvascular free flap reconstruction.
STUDY
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Tertiary academic medical center.
Methods
Patients aged ≥ 70 years old who underwent oncologic resection and free flap reconstruction from 2014 to 2022 were included. Patients were stratified by 5-item Modified Frailty Index score into non-frail (0), mildly frail (1), and moderately to severely frail (≥2). Primary outcomes included 90-day mortality, 30-day complications, readmission, and return to the operating room. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control potential confounders.
Results
A total of 211 patients were included. Patients with 5-item Modified Frailty Index scores ≥ 2 had significantly higher 90-day mortality compared to less frail patients (p = 0.031), and they were more frequently discharged to a facility rather than home. While not statistically significant, complication and readmission rates were higher in frail patients. Multivariable analysis showed that patients with 5-item Modified Frailty Index ≥ 2 had increased odds of experiencing complications (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.06-5.91)and mortality (OR 1.17, 95 % CI 0.36-4.59).
Conclusion
The 5-item Modified Frailty Index is a simple and clinically useful tool for identifying older head and neck cancer patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes following major surgery. Its incorporation into preoperative risk assessment may improve surgical decision-making and perioperative planning by better stratifying risk and guiding resource allocation.
Because this retrospective study was limited by sample size, comorbidity-driven mFI-5 scoring, non-standardized delirium screening, and potential residual confounding, mFI-5 should be interpreted as a convenient screening marker rather than a stand-alone predictor.
K. Yamagata, S. Fukuzawa, Shohei Takaoka et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are common in the elderly and are typically treated operatively. Tools like frailty assessments may be critical for evaluating peri- and postoperative patient needs. Our study evaluated the utility of frailty, measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and the Modified 5-Item Fra...
Ethan Parisier, Victor Koltenyuk, Nithin K. Gupta et al.· Journal of Arthroplasty· 0 citations
The prognostic value of the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) in patients with proximal femur fractures who were monitored in the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) and to evaluate its relationship with clinical outcomes was demonstrated.
Berkay Küçük, Osman Yağız Atlı· Journal of Medicine and Pall...· 0 citations
It is found that frailty is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients aged 80 years or older undergoing major abdominal surgery, and incorporating frailty assessment into routine preoperative evaluation may improve risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
M. Şahin, Özge Öztürk, Ş. Sevi̇m et al.· Turkish Journal of Geriatric...· 0 citations
FRAIL Scale improvement was driven mainly by resolution of the weight‐loss criterion, with modest weight gain and no clear overall body‐weight recovery, supporting a multidimensional interpretation of postoperative recovery in older patients.
H. Ushigome, Takuya Suzuki, S. Hayakawa et al.· Annals of Gastroenterologica...· 0 citations
Compared to the SCOPE-C screening tool, the G8 demonstrated statistically significant predictive value for both major surgical complications and readmissions; however, its low AUC indicates limited sensitivity and guarded clinical usefulness in predicting major postoperative complications.
Amit Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, P. Sagar et al.· Journal of Geriatric Oncolog...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.