Skip to content

A Human-in-the-Loop Corpus for LLM-Based Simplification of Scientific Summaries

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.25630 · 0 citations · 18 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work study large language model (LLM)-based simplification of scientific texts and presents a human-in-the-loop workflow that transforms expert summaries into more accessible versions for non-specialists.

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is accelerating, yet scientific papers remain difficult to understand outside their home fields. We study large language model (LLM)-based simplification of scientific texts and present a human-in-the-loop workflow that transforms expert summaries into more accessible versions for non-specialists. Using SciSummNet as the source corpus, we first generate baseline simplifications with GPT-4o-mini. In Phase 1, readers from STEM fields outside computer science identify difficult sentences and phrases and compare the original and GPT-simplified summaries in terms of comprehensibility, naturalness, and simplicity. In Phase 2, computer science experts use this feedback to create expert-edited reference simplifications. We release the resulting corpus together with human judgments and automatic evaluation results. The Phase 1 judgments show a clear preference for the GPT-generated summaries in terms of comprehensibility and simplicity, while qualitative analysis of the Phase 2 edits highlights the importance of preserving domain-specific terminology and the strength of scientific claims. The resulting resource supports the training and benchmarking of simplification systems for cross-disciplinary scientific communication.

View source

Similar papers

2026

Assessing Transformer Models for Abstractive Summarization of Scientific Articles

The results show that BART achieves the best performance with an ROUGE-2 F1-score of 0.40664, while T5 demonstrates superior grammatical acceptability, achieving 93.36%, but BART achieves a very near performance to T5.

Emad Nabil · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Synergistic Summarization: An Ensemble of Fine-Tuned and Large-Scale Language Models for Factual and Coherent Scientific Abstracts

The exponential growth of scientific literature has intensified the demand for automated summarization systems capable of producing abstracts that are both linguistically fluent and factually reliable. Existing approaches face a fundamental trade-off: encoder-decoder models such as BART and T5 maintain strong factual g...

Geoffrey Antonio Arifin, Andrew Widyanata, Henry Lucky et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Reassessment of TextRank: Graph-Based Extractive Summarization in the Era of Large Language Models- A Systematic Review

This survey presents a systematic review of 121 references spanning 2002 to 2026, tracing the evolution of TextRank-based approaches into hybrid LLM pipelines and advancing three qualified arguments.

Ahmed J. Jabur, Asmaa Abdul Azeez Dakhil, Israa Saad Mohammed et al. · 0 citations
2026

Controllable Sentence Simplification in Italian: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models on Automatically Generated Resources

Results from automatic and human evaluations show that fine-tuning on IMPaCTS improves performance both in terms of task completion and adherence to the targeted readability levels compared to few-shot baselines.

Michele Papucci, Giulia Venturi, F. Dell'orletta · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers

This study proposes a novel two-level diagnostic protocol for benchmarking LLM-summarizers based on the stability of the generated summaries and motivates further research towards development of robust, reliable and trustworthy LLM-summarizers.

Vasudha Bhatnagar, Purnima Bindal, Vikas Kumar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.