Skip to content
Review Open access

Optimizing Curriculum Integration: Development and Validation of the Tool of Integration Practices (TIP) in Health Professions Education - A Mixed Methods Study

Aug 2026 · Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences · Vol 42, pp. 2381 - 2392 · 0 citations · 18 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The Tool of Integration Practices (TIP) demonstrated adequate validity and reliability and provides a practical, psychometrically sound framework for assessing and comparing curriculum integration practices based on faculty perceptions at the course and program levels in health professions education.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Curriculum integration is increasingly adopted in medical and dental education, yet only a few validated tools exist to measure it objectively. Existing curriculum integration frameworks, including Harden’s ladder, are primarily descriptive and challenging to apply for systematic evaluation. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a valid and reliable tool to assess the level of integration in medical and dental curricula. Methodology: A multiphase mixed-method approach was employed over nine months from July 2023 to March 2024 at Riphah International University, Pakistan. Literature review identified eight domains representing curriculum integration, each structured on a five-point scale informed by Harden’s integration ladder. Content validity was established through expert reviews (n = 17), followed by cognitive interviews with faculty (n = 6) to obtain response process validity. Medical and dental faculty (n = 150) participated in pilot testing. Internal structure validity evidence was evaluated by Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Content validation yielded a seven-domain instrument with a mean content validity index of 0.89 and an average content clarity score of 3.46. Cognitive interviews led to minor revisions in four items. The final tool demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88). EFA supported a one-factor model, confirmed by CFA (GFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.052, normed χ² = 1.4), indicating a good model fit. Conclusion: The Tool of Integration Practices (TIP) demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. It provides a practical, psychometrically sound framework for assessing and comparing curriculum integration practices based on faculty perceptions at the course and program levels in health professions education.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Curricular integration of the sustainable development goals in nursing education: evidence from the Universidad Técnica del Norte (Ecuador)

The purpose of this paper is to examine how the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are integrated into a nursing education program at the Universidad Técnica del Norte (UTN), Ecuador and to identify the institutional, curricular and pedagogical factors associated with their explicit incorporation. The study aims...

Katty Elizabeth Cabascango Cabascango, Patricia Marlene Aguirre Mejía, Freddy Hernán Villota González et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Advancing Health Workforce Education: Development and Psychometric Validation of the Challenges in Team-Based Learning Questionnaire (CTBLQ) in Vietnam

Overall, the CTBLQ demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and provides a standardized diagnostic instrument for identifying barriers to Team-Based Learning implementation and may support evidence-informed curriculum evaluation, educational planning, and future research in nursing education while contributing...

K. Pham, Leslie F. Lazaro · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Design and Validation of a Mind Map Assessment Checklist Based on Kane’s Validity Framework: A Novel Assessment Tool

A comprehensive checklist to evaluate mind maps as a formative assessment tool among bachelor of anesthesia technology students, addressing structural, scientific, and creative dimensions demonstrates strong validity and reliability for formative assessment in anesthesia technology education.

A. S. Sajadi, Alireza Babajani, Raheleh Charmchi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Design and Validation of a Clinical Teaching Performance Checklist in Anesthesia Education: A Kane-Based Approach

Preliminary evidence offers promising preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility, validity, and reliability of the EPA-based checklist for clinical teaching assessment; however, broader confirmation through larger, multicenter studies is required prior to widespread implementation.

A. S. Sajadi, N. Hamidi, Shahnam Sedigh-Maroufi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Workplace-Based Assessment in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Tools, Validity, and Educational Impact

Evidence indicates that WBA tools significantly improve procedural and clinical competencies through structured observation and immediate feedback, and is a valid, reliable, and educationally valuable approach when implemented longitudinally and supported by rater training and institutional commitment.

Md. Rasel Ahmad, Anika Mahfuz, Kazi Shantono Saiham et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Faculty Development Program in Enhancing the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions: A Quantitative Study

Incorporation of multiple structured faculty development workshops lead to measurable improvements in MCQ quality, and these training sessions can enhance the reliability and validity of medical assessments, benefiting both educators and learners.

S. Amjad, N. Ijaz, Zakia Saleem et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.