Skip to content
Open access

Comparison of intranasal ketamine versus intranasal dexmedetomidine as a pre-medication during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients

Jul 2026 · Aposta: Revista de Ciencias Sociales · Vol 24, pp. e1350 · 0 citations · 17 references

TL;DR

Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to be the preferred premedication for facilitating smooth anesthetic induction in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery while maintaining comparable hemodynamic stability and induction time.

Abstract

Background: Preoperative anxiety in children undergoing surgery can complicate anesthetic induction and adversely affect perioperative outcomes. Intranasal administration of premedication is a non-invasive route that provides rapid drug absorption and good patient compliance. This study compared the efficacy of intranasal ketamine and intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery. Methods: This double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Lahore, from January 2026 to May 2026. A total of 134 children aged 2–6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective ENT surgery were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal ketamine (5 mg/kg; Group K, n = 67) or intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg; Group D, n = 67). The primary outcome was effective mask acceptance, defined as a Mask Acceptance Score (MAS) ≤2 during anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, induction time, and adverse events, including coughing, sneezing, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Effective mask acceptance (MAS ≤2) was achieved in 85.1% of children receiving dexmedetomidine compared with 67.2% receiving ketamine (p < 0.05). Poor mask acceptance (MAS = 3) occurred more frequently in the ketamine group (32.8%) than in the dexmedetomidine group (14.9%). Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and induction time did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the ketamine group (25.4%) than in the dexmedetomidine group (10.4%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, coughing and sneezing were more frequent with ketamine, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: Intranasal dexmedetomidine provided significantly better mask acceptance than intranasal ketamine while maintaining comparable hemodynamic stability and induction time. Although adverse events were numerically fewer with dexmedetomidine, these differences were not statistically significant. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to be the preferred premedication for facilitating smooth anesthetic induction in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Oral Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Oral Ketamine-Midazolam as Premedication in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under Anaesthesia

Ketamine-dexmedetomidine as a preferred oral premedication option in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery support ketamine-dexmedetomidine as a preferred oral premedication option in Pediatrics.

Neha D Pokar, Sarika Dhaduk · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam, S-ketamine, and dexmedetomidine as premedication for pediatric tonsillectomy: A comparative study (premedication in pediatric tonsillectomy study)

S-ketamine provides superior analgesia and reduces intraoperative opioid requirements without compromising sedation or anxiolysis, suggesting it may be a preferable option in this population of children undergoing tonsillectomy.

Ivana Fajertag, Vlado Janković, Maja Sujica et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires deep sedation to ensure immobility and optimal image quality. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is effective but may cause airway depression and hemodynamic instability at higher doses. Dexmedetomidine has minimal respiratory effects but may prolong se...

Kishorkumar Dhanaboopathy, E. Rai, Aparna Williams et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Effect of intrathecal fentanyl on dexmedetomidine requirement for sedation during spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Adequate sedation during spinal anesthesia requires careful titration to avoid hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications. We hypothesized that intrathecal fentanyl, used as an adjunct to neuraxial anesthesia, would reduce dexmedetomidine requirements for conscious sedation. This study evaluated t...

K. B. Park, J. Yeom, Juhee Min et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam and Fentanyl-Midazolam for Sedation and Analgesia in Lower Extremity Orthopedic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a very commonly used procedure in modern-day anesthesia practice. Today most of the lower limb surgeries are performed under spinal anesthesia. Midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl are common intravenous adjuvants used during anesthesia to allay anxiety and sedation. The aim of this...

M. Rahimi, Mohamad Sorani, Afzal Shamsi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Combined with Local Infiltration Anesthesia for Perioperative Pain and Anxiety in PELD: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Awake percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) preserves intraoperative patient feedback, but local infiltration anesthesia may inadequately control pain and anxiety during deeper procedural stages. Intranasal dexmedetomidine offers a noninvasive adjunct, although evidence in this setting remains lim...

Yonghong Zhou, Chao Pan, Yan Jiang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.