This article offers a comprehensive overview of mechanistic interpretability, an emerging field that seeks to reverse-engineer the internal algorithms of modern neural networks, and explores methods for actively controlling and modifying model behavior through steering vectors and causal interventions.
Abstract
This article offers a comprehensive overview of mechanistic interpretability, an emerging field that seeks to reverse-engineer the internal algorithms of modern neural networks. While traditional explainable AI methods often stop at surface-level input-output correlations, this approach directly addresses the opaque"black box"nature of machine learning models, which is essential for ensuring safety and auditability in high-stakes deployments. The paper provides a detailed examination of Transformer circuit analysis, exploring how internal components like the residual stream, attention mechanisms, and induction heads drive complex tasks and in-context learning. It subsequently tackles the core challenge of superposition and polysemanticity, demonstrating how tools like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and transcoders can decompose tangled network activations into distinct, human-interpretable features. Furthermore, the paper explores methods for actively controlling and modifying model behavior through steering vectors and causal interventions. Finally, it connects these mechanistic insights with neurosymbolic AI frameworks designed to translate neural representations into explicit, executable logical rules.
It is argued that mechanistic interpretability has the potential to support a more scientific understanding of machine learning systems – treating models not only as tools for solving tasks, but also as systems to be studied and understood.
A systematic review and synthesis of symbolic explainable AI (XAI) for deep learning is provided and a conceptual framework is proposed that clarifies training–inference flows, explanation interfaces, human feedback, and governance touchpoints is proposed.
Eduard Ionel Stan, G. Sciavicco, Paolo Napoletano· Journal of Artificial Intell...· 0 citations
This work bridges hybrid modeling and neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI by reconstructing these designs as instances of NeSy interface and derives metrics: structural violation rate (SVR), measuring whether the learned belief respects the mechanistic structure; and belief dispersion (BD), measuring how concentrated the learned...
Moein E. Samadi, Andreas Schuppert· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This tutorial provides a comprehensive, end-to-end view of LLM interpretability, transitioning from microscopic neural analysis to macroscopic application and deployment, and explores how these interpretability paradigms scale and inspire the design of frontier architectures, agentic systems, and thinking models.
Wei Zhang, Zheng-Fu He, Lu-Lu Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
It is shown that across a broad class of ANNs trained on diverse tasks, their inference logic can indeed be reformulated as sparse symbolic interactions, and two common mathematical criteria lead to the emergence of such sparse symbolic interactions.
A cognitively inspired neuro-symbolic framework for extracting interpretable world models from raw video streams in dynamic 2D environments and proposes a domain-agnostic agent that develops complex behaviors driven by a composite intrinsic reward based on causal impact and event-driven curiosity.
Lorenzo Cardone, Giorgia Ghisolfo, G. Mongardi et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.