2026· SINTEZA· pp. 144-150· 0 citations· 22 references
TL;DR
Evaluated tree-based ensemble models, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, for static malware detection in PE files show that tree-based ensembles outperform deep learning models, such as Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), as well as traditional machine learning approaches in handling high-dimensional tabular data.
Abstract
: Protection against zero-day and polymorphic malware, particularly those targeting the Windows Portable Executable (PE) format, requires detection mechanisms that are both highly accurate and capable of real-time operation. Traditional approaches, including signature-based detection and computationally intensive dynamic analysis, struggle to meet the strict sub-second latency requirements of modern endpoint protection systems, limiting their effectiveness against evolving threats. This study evaluates the performance and practical applicability of tree-based ensemble models, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, for static malware detection in PE files. The proposed framework employs a zero-execution pipeline, extracting metadata, section entropy, and Import Address Table (IAT) configurations, while applying Information Gain (IG) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce computational overhead. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that tree-based ensembles outperform deep learning models, such as Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), as well as traditional machine learning approaches in handling high-dimensional tabular data. While XGBoost achieves the highest classification accuracy of 99.68%, LightGBM demonstrates superior overall operational performance. Its efficiency, enabled by leaf-wise tree growth and histogram-based optimization, ensures low-latency inference and reduced memory usage. These properties make it well-suited for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems, where real-time performance is essential. The findings also highlight the importance of integrating Explainable AI (XAI) and advanced training strategies to improve robustness against increasingly sophisticated evasion techniques.
Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves high classification performance while improving transparency in malware detection decisions, making it suitable for practical cybersecurity applications.
V. Padmapriya, S. Uma, S. Sumathi et al.· International journal of com...· 0 citations
Malware severely threatens cybersecurity through Portable Executable (PE) files. In this study, the performances of machine learning and deep learning models for malware detection are compared using static analysis features extracted from PE files. Tree-based ensemble models like Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and C...
Gokay Mutlu, Neşe Rihani, E. Bayazit· Signal Processing and Commun...· 0 citations
The results suggest that well-designed classical ensemble approaches are still quite competitive for scalable and interpretable static malware detection even with the rising usage of more and more powerful machine learning architectures.
A. Fauzan, Tito Pinandita, Aulia Desy Nur Utomo· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
An efficient stacked-ensemble model that estimates how likely a given executable is to be malicious and is compared against recent malware research/types are compared and identified for future research work/area.
Deepak Singh Rana, S. Dimri· International journal of com...· 0 citations
Random Forest achieves the highest performance with a test accuracy of 96.3%, F1-score of 0.947, and AUC of 0.993, establishing it as the optimal algorithm for static malware detection tasks and establishing it as the optimal algorithm for static malware detection tasks.
Umesh Balami, Ganesh Gautam, Gajendra Sharma· American Journal of Agricult...· 0 citations
A Transformerbased deep learning approach for detecting malicious Windows Portable Executable files is presented, significantly outperforming baseline methods including LightGBM, MalConv, and LSTM.
E. Baghirov· “Kibertəhlükəsizlik və rəqəm...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.