Skip to content

Medical-Checklist: Assessing the Comprehension of Medical Images by Multimodal Models.

Jul 2026 · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · Vol PP, pp. 1-10 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science Medicine

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new benchmark test, Medical-Checklist, for assessing medical multimodal models, designed to reduce potential biases in data and to enable evaluation of the models' ability to handle out-of-distribution inputs, which were difficult in existing datasets.

Abstract

This paper introduces a new benchmark test, Medical-Checklist, for assessing medical multimodal models. The recent advancements in multimodal models have demonstrated significant potential in the field of medical vision-language tasks. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that evaluating these models' performance, whether they are applied to natural or medical images, is challenging. The critical question is whether the models can accurately understand an input image while associating it with relevant input text. To address this, Medical-Checklist imposes a binary test on the models: they are given an image and two captions, where one is correct and the other incorrect, and the model must select the correct one. The incorrect caption contains a single medical concept (word or phrase) that is inaccurately substituted from the correct caption. Although the task is simple, this simplicity enables the unified assessment of diverse multimodal models designed and learned on different principles. It also enables us to verify whether models correctly understand a wide range of medical concepts across various medical sub-domains. Medical-Checklist is designed to reduce potential biases in data and to enable evaluation of the models' ability to handle out-of-distribution inputs, which were difficult in existing datasets. When evaluating four state-of-the-art medical multimodal models with Medical-Checklist, it was revealed that despite their excellent performance in specific tasks such as Med-VQA, they may not correctly understand images, suggesting a long journey ahead for clinical application. The dataset and code will be made public upon acceptance.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Generating Image-Based Multiple-Choice Questions with Multimodal Large Language Models: Expert and Psychometric Evaluation.

Multimodal large language models are best positioned as supervised tools requiring radiologist verification and item-level psychometric evaluation in multiple-choice questions generated by GPT-4o and o3 from correctly recognized radiographs and compare selected items with faculty-written questions.

E. Emekli, Murat Tepe, Serhat Demir et al. · 1 citation
Aug 2026

Do Accuracy Gains Reflect Genuine Visual Understanding? A Multi-Model Evaluation of Vision-Language Models in Thoracic Imaging.

Even at the highest accuracy observed here, answer-level performance can overstate visual understanding, pointing to the need for more appropriate evaluation methods that assess whether a model's reasoning is faithful to the image, not only whether its answer is correct.

Jiyoung Song, Won Gi Jeong, Hongseok Ko et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

RadSight: Towards Perceptually Reliable Multimodal Radiology Image Understanding

RadSight is proposed, a perception-driven MLLM built upon a dual 2D/3D encoder architecture that preserves native imaging spatial structures that achieves consistent improvements on public 2D and 3D medical benchmarks, further demonstrating that robust low-level visual perception is a critical foundation for reliable c...

Jianqi Liu, Weiwei Cao, Wan-Xing Chang et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Entity-Aware Medical Image Captioning

The results demonstrate that explicit modeling with structured semantic information within vision-language frameworks are crucial and that entity-aware methods have the potential to greatly improve captioning.

Shaik Rafi, Syed Rizwana, P. Drutika et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Radiological VQA with Multimodal LLMs: Performance and Insights

The findings reinforce that MLLMs currently serve best as assistive decisionsupport tools rather than autonomous diagnostic agents, and highlight the potential of retrieval-augmented and context-aware strategies for improving clinical reliability and interpretability.

Cristovão Pessoa Cândido, Matheus Alves de Oliveira Lima, C. de Souza Baptista et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.