MolJam: A Multidimensional Framework for Assessing Molecular Dataset Quality and Its Impact on Machine Learning

Abstract

High-quality molecular datasets are essential for reliable machine learning in cheminformatics and bioinformatics, yet dataset quality is rarely assessed systematically and its relationship with downstream model performance remains poorly understood. Here, we present MolJam, an open-source frame-work for quantitative assessment of molecular dataset quality across five dimensions—structural integrity, data quality, experimental information quality, chemical space coverage, and data distribution—using 12 standardized metrics. Application of MolJam to 11 MoleculeNet and 8 ChEMBL-derived datasets revealed widespread and heterogeneous quality issues, including undefined stereochemistry in up to 70.72% of molecules, inconsistent molecular representations, and contradictory labels. We next asked whether improving these quality metrics necessarily improves machine learning performance. Refinement of the ESOL and Lipophilicity datasets increased their MolJam quality scores but produced mixed effects on predictive performance, suggesting a competing influence of reduced dataset size. Controlled ablation experiments further demonstrated that both dataset quality and data quantity contribute to model performance and, notably, that retaining molecules with incomplete stereochemical information can outperform their removal when the resulting gain in data quantity offsets the quality penalty. Thus, molecular dataset curation cannot be reduced to maximizing data cleanliness alone but requires balancing multiple dimensions of data quality against information loss. MolJam provides a standardized framework for diagnosing molecular dataset limitations, comparing benchmark quality, and quantitatively evaluating how data curation decisions influence downstream machine learning.