“Development of an Integrated Information Security Governance Maturity Assessment Framework for Higher Education Institutions Using COBIT 2019 and ISO/IEC 27001: A Design Science Research Approach”
Jul 2026· International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science· Vol 15, pp. 202-224· 0 citations· 17 references
TL;DR
An Integrated Information Security Governance Maturity Assessment Framework for Higher Education Institutions is developed by merging the governance principles of COBIT 2019 with the information security management demands of ISO/IEC 27001 and lays the groundwork for further implementation, testing, and empirical validation in real university settings.
Abstract
The adoption of digital technologies, online learning platforms, and electronic services has significantly changed the functioning of higher education institutions. Universities and colleges now rely extensively on digital platforms for teaching, learning, research, and administrative functions. As a result, these institutions manage large quantities of sensitive data, including student records, financial information, research findings, and other vital assets.
In parallel, the rise in cybersecurity threats has underscored the necessity for enhanced information security governance to protect these resources and ensure secure and efficient technology use across campuses. Although established frameworks such as COBIT 2019 and ISO/IEC 27001 offer valuable guidance on governance and information security management, they are often implemented independently. This separation can cause gaps, overlaps, and inconsistencies in governance practices. To address this issue, this study developed an Integrated Information Security Governance Maturity Assessment Framework specifically for Higher Education Institutions by merging the governance principles of COBIT 2019 with the information security management demands of ISO/IEC 27001.
The research employed a Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to develop a framework that is robust in theory and applicable to the higher education sector. This framework was built through a comprehensive analysis of COBIT 2019, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, relevant academic sources, and existing governance maturity models. The resulting framework encompasses five assessment dimensions: Governance and Leadership, Risk and Compliance Management, Security Operations and Control Management, Monitoring and Performance Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement and Governance Optimization.
Additionally, a five-level maturity model was crafted to enable institutions to evaluate their current governance capability and identify areas needing further development. Findings indicate that integrating COBIT 2019 and ISO/IEC 27001 results in a more systematic and thorough approach to information security governance. The framework provides higher education institutions with a practical tool for assessing governance maturity, planning improvement efforts, and enhancing cybersecurity governance. It also lays the groundwork for further implementation, testing, and empirical validation in real university settings.
Higher education institutions manage large volumes of sensitive information, including personal data of students and staff, research data, financial records, and operational information. The increasing number of cyber incidents affecting universities, both globally and in Indonesia, indicated the need for a more struct...
Neonatal March Parera, Wiwin Sulistyo, J. Tambotoh· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The case indicates that university digital transformation is strengthened when technological implementation is integrated with formal governance, systematic assessment, evidence-based planning, and institutional accountability.
Jennifer Célleri-Pacheco, Fernanda Tusa Jumbo, Oswaldo Chuquirima Camacho et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations
This research evaluates the information security posture of the Padang City Communication and Informatics Office, focusing on its readiness to sustain digital transformation, and finds that while several protective processes are active, they lack formal documentation and optimal coordination.
Fitri Safnita, Putri Ramdani, Maisan Dewi Puspa Khairani et al.· Komputasi· 0 citations
The article proposes the Digital Infrastructure Governance and Selection (DIGS) framework, which combines seven decision domains with six stage gates spanning problem definition, mandatory assurance, comparative assessment, controlled piloting, contracting and implementation, and lifecycle review and is a transparent d...
Fatema Akter· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
It is concluded that digital access security should be treated not merely as a technical concern but as a prerequisite for equitable and resilient vocational learning, calling for integrated socio-technical and pedagogically informed security strategies.
K. Agyeibi, Budi Mulyanti, Agus Setiawan et al.· Jurnal Sosioteknologi· 0 citations
A structured and reusable compliance design artefact for aligning NIS2 obligations with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses and Annex A controls in the context of higher education institutions is proposed.
Alexandru Iovanovici, L. Prodan· Journal of Cybersecurity and...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.