Skip to content
Review

Perspectives in Oncology Management and Research

· 0 citations · 113 references

TL;DR

It is suggested that AI systems are commonly performance-validated but insufficiently outcome-verified, which contributes to limited adoption and must be bridged through workflow-native design, prospective clinical validation, interoperable digital infrastructure, and alignment of technological innovation with healthcare system readiness.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Oncology Clinical Practice: From Initial Patient Assessment to Outcome Prediction

A narrative review of recent clinical, translational, and health-services literature was conducted, focusing on AI tools deployed in routine or near-term oncology practice, and organizes evidence along the cancer care continuum, from first presentation to outcome prediction, and integrates ethical, legal, and regulator...

Ganesh H. Divekar, Bharat Bhosale · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Federated Learning in Precision Oncology: Bridging Multi-Institutional Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Implementation

This commentary describes how FL is evolving into an essential component across all stages of the precision oncology process, including areas such as radiomics, digital pathology, genomics, multi-omics analysis, molecular tumor board decision-making, patient matching in clinical trials, and development of multimodal AI...

Afzal Hussain, Ashfaq Hussain · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Autonomous AI in prostate cancer: the road ahead towards clinical implementation.

The findings highlight the need for evidence from large, multicenter, prospective trials and evaluation frameworks that reflect the consequences of clinical decision-making, as well as further exploration of safeguards to monitor and address mismatches between training data and incoming scans during deployment.

Lisa Koopmans, Fernando Vega Lara, Christian Roest et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Overall, AI represents a highly promising adjunct to clinical decision-making in liver transplantation; however, robust prospective validation, standardized reporting frameworks, and clinically interpretable implementations remain necessary prior to widespread adoption.

Panagiotis Boutos, James L. Rogers, Efthymia Kouvela et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Trustworthy artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: cross-industry lessons for development, validation, and deployment

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding across the radiation oncology workflow, with applications spanning imaging, contouring, treatment planning, quality assurance, outcome prediction, workflow automation, and clinical decision support. Although technical progress has accelerated substantially, successful c...

Malinda Zhu, Lang Gou, Chi Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: a systematic review of diagnostic performance, predictive modeling, and clinical translation.

The objective of this study is to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance, predictive capabilities, and clinical readiness of AI-based models in breast cancer imaging, with emphasis on methodological quality, validation strategies, and translational applicability.

Lohitha Gumma, Bhargavi Gumma · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.