Skip to content
Open access

Multiscale Transfer of Cohesive-Zone Parameters for Opening-Dominated Interlaminar Fracture in Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Aluminum Laminates

Sep 2026 · Polymers · Vol 18 · 0 citations · 71 references
Medicine

Abstract

Specimen-scale fitting can reproduce interlaminar fracture in carbon-fiber-reinforced aluminum laminates (CARALL) but obscures the physical origin of cohesive-zone parameters. We present a multiscale framework integrating molecular dynamics (MD), a representative volume element (RVE), finite element (FE) modeling, and opening-dominated asymmetric double-cantilever-beam (DCB) tests. At modeled high rates, an ideal nonbonded Al/epoxy interface exhibited normal and tangential strengths of 470.09 and 352.93 MPa, respectively. Across 0.001–0.005 Å/fs, normal and tangential peak tractions increased by 5.93% and 5.82%, respectively, whereas traction-separation integrals varied nonmonotonically. These single-atomistic-realization descriptors were transferred to an RVE containing Al/matrix and fiber/matrix interfaces. In this morphology, fiber/matrix debonding preceded Al/matrix damage in all three realizations, and the RVE yielded mean effective normal and tangential strengths of 27.42 ± 0.33 and 39.04 ± 0.65 MPa, together with mean Mode I and Mode II fracture energies of 0.36 ± 0.02 and 0.81 ± 0.04 N/mm, respectively, where the means and standard deviations are taken over the three stochastic fiber realizations. The RVE-derived strengths and fracture energies were assigned directly to the DCB model without fitting the experimental response. The FE peak load was 44.48 N, 5.50% above the four-specimen mean of 42.16 ± 1.22 N, and the predicted damage location was qualitatively consistent with the observed Al/matrix interfacial damage. Because the interface model is idealized and the comparison rests on load–displacement data without synchronized crack-length measurements or independent fracture-resistance data, these results are reported as a configuration-specific assessment of the transfer procedure rather than as a quantitative validation; the transferred parameters are not intended to predict the chemically and structurally complex anodized interface.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.