Jul 2026· Academia Neuroscience and Brain Research· 0 citations· 161 references
TL;DR
The importance of combining neurophysiological assessments with rTMS to better understand post-stroke recovery mechanisms and support the development of more targeted rehabilitation strategies is highlighted.
Abstract
Stroke is a major cerebrovascular disorder that commonly causes motor and cognitive impairments, significantly affecting the quality of life of stroke survivors. Upper-limb dysfunction is one of the most frequent complications after stroke, affecting nearly 77% of patients and limiting their ability to perform daily activities independently. In recent years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has gained increasing attention as a potential therapeutic approach for improving upper-limb motor recovery after stroke. This narrative review aims to discuss the neurophysiological basis of rTMS-induced motor recovery and examine the role of neurophysiological biomarkers in evaluating treatment outcomes. Relevant literature was identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, focusing on studies related to rTMS, cortical excitability, electroencephalography (EEG), heart rate variability (HRV), and post-stroke motor recovery. Current evidence suggests that rTMS may promote recovery by modulating cortical excitability, restoring interhemispheric balance, and influencing functional connectivity and autonomic regulation. Neurophysiological measures such as TMS-derived cortical excitability parameters, EEG activity, and HRV indices may help understand the mechanisms underlying recovery and the therapeutic effects of rTMS. However, studies integrating these neurophysiological measures remain limited. This review highlights the importance of combining neurophysiological assessments with rTMS to better understand post-stroke recovery mechanisms and support the development of more targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Although MEP shows promise as a biomarker for cognitive impairment assessment, longitudinal validation is needed to confirm its predictive utility, as the excitability of the unaffected motor cortex progressively declines with worsening cognition.
Zhipeng Yan, Hao Luo, Bilian Guo· Annals of Human Biology· 0 citations
Contralesional LF-rTMS provides a statistically significant but modest improvement in post-stroke upper-limb motor recovery, and exploratory within-trial biomarker-stratified analyses suggested larger effects in participants with preserved CST integrity or positive motor-evoked potential (MEP) status.
M. Yu, Y. Zeng, H. Zhou et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
It is suggested that motor improvement following combined Hi-tACS and MIRT in PD patients is associated with alterations in brain oscillations and network connectivity, particularly in high-beta frequencies.
Tingting Hou, Ke-Ke Chen, Hongyu Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
Brain age measures reflect cognitive, but not antidepressant, outcomes following rTMS in LLD, and Structural-MRI based centile scores may serve as biomarkers of cognitive function and predictors of rTMS-related cognitive improvement in individuals with LLD.
Dora Shi, Tesam Ahmed, Katharina Göke et al.· Biological Psychiatry: Cogni...· 0 citations
Preliminary effects suggest that thalamic tFUS can modulate both local and networklevel neural activity and is associated with immediate functional improvement, highlighting its potential as a feasible neuromodulation approach for deep motor circuit engagement in post-stroke rehabilitation.
S. Wu, X. Zhang, J. Kang et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Overall, the certainty of evidence was low to very low, downgraded primarily for these risk of bias concerns, severe imprecision (due to small sample sizes), and potential publication bias.
Yu Qin, Mei-Xuan Li, Yan-fei Li et al.· Cochrane Database of Systema...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.