Skip to content
Review Open access

Global prevalence and patterns of benzodiazepine use among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sep 2026 · Public Health · Vol 259, pp. 106490 · 0 citations · 40 references
Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

To synthesise global evidence on the prevalence, patterns of use, and clinical correlates of benzodiazepine (BZD) use among adolescents and young adults aged 16-30 years, and to identify methodological sources of heterogeneity in prevalence estimates across international settings. STUDY

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for observational studies published between January 2015 and October 2025 reporting BZD use in individuals aged 16-30 years. Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Predefined exploratory subgroup analyses examined type of consumption, geographic region, data source, population type, and study size. Univariable meta-regression explored potential sources of heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Hoy et al. tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD1230633).

Results

Fifteen studies (N = 7,235,912) were included. The pooled overall prevalence estimate was 4.4% (95% CI: 1.8 to 8.2%). Mixed medical/non-medical use yielded the highest estimate (5.9%), followed by medical use (3.6%) and misuse (3.3%). Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested differences by study size (p = 0.012), with small studies reporting higher prevalence estimates than medium-sized studies. Key correlates included female sex, psychiatric comorbidity (ADHD, depression), and polydrug use.

Conclusions

Benzodiazepine exposure is common among adolescents and young adults. Prevalence appears context-dependent, likely reflecting differences in prescribing practices, access pathways, and exposure measurement across settings. These findings highlight the importance of developmentally tailored prescribing guidelines and suggest that expanding non-pharmacological alternatives may be warranted in this population.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.