Aug 2026· AI and Ethics· Vol 6· 0 citations· 27 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper advances a layered ethics-stack perspective and argues that AI governance should be evaluated not only by the presence of principles, but also by the distribution of operational controls, positive commitments, and enforceable constraints across institutional layers.
The concept of partially open AI governance is developed, understood as a differentiated arrangement of access, disclosure, and oversight across distinct layers of AI systems, which offers a more realistic way of aligning innovation incentives with ethical and public objectives in the governance of large language model...
Patrick Hedfeld· Science and Engineering Ethi...· 0 citations
The rapid global deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) has created governance challenges relating to accountability, privacy, corporate oversight, and regulatory compliance. While the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are often analysed separ...
Maria de Lourdes Haynes, Akram Al Matarneh· Corporate Law & Governan...· 0 citations
This Policy and Practice Review concludes that AI-enabled administration remains legitimate only where public authorities retain the capacity to understand, justify, correct, suspend and democratically control the systems they use.
A. Dragomir, Iulea Bulea, Lucian Tarnu· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 2 citations
It is argued that AI ethics can address this deficit only when complemented by institutional reforms that embed deliberation, broaden participation and ensure meaningful public accountability, including the involvement of non-expert citizens.
The central claim is that constitutional and democratic requirements should not be treated as external compliance burdens when embedded into institutional design, they operate as productive constraints that improve legitimacy, implementation discipline, and the long-term trustworthiness of AI-enabled public decision-ma...
C. Oliveira· Open Access Journal of Data...· 0 citations
This paper analyzes five influential documents representing the broad field of AI ethics as a ‘sociotechnical imaginary’: a collectively held, institutionalized, and publicly performed vision of the future and outlines alternative pathways toward historically, geographically, and politically situated forms of ethics.
K. Schiølin· Danish Yearbook of Philosoph...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.