It is argued that AI does not produce outcomes directly; rather, its effects are contingent on how it is accepted, interpreted, and enacted within school contexts, and trust shapes whether AI leads to constructive outcomes, including ethical use, professional engagement, and improvement, or to disruptive consequences such as resistance and mistrust.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping school leadership within Education 4.0, offering enhanced decision-making and organisational efficiency while intensifying ethical concerns regarding transparency, bias, and accountability. Existing research has largely treated these opportunities and risks as separate phenomena, overlooking the relational processes through which AI is enacted in practice. This paper advances a process-based conceptualisation by positioning trust as the central mediating mechanism in AI-enabled school leadership. It argues that AI does not produce outcomes directly; rather, its effects are contingent on how it is accepted, interpreted, and enacted within school contexts. The proposed framework shows that trust shapes whether AI leads to constructive outcomes, including ethical use, professional engagement, and improvement, or to disruptive consequences such as resistance and mistrust. Leadership is conceptualised as a key antecedent of trust, highlighting the centrality of relational governance in the effective and responsible integration of AI in schools.
As organisations increasingly embed artificial intelligence (AI) into the routines of leadership, from predictive performance dashboards to AI-assisted feedback and coaching tools, a pressing but underexamined question is how this technological augmentation of leadership shapes employees' willingness to speak up. This...
K. I. Amadi· Journal of Management Resear...· 0 citations
The paper develops the AI-augmented leadership–well-being–relational energy model, which provides leaders and organizations with a critical, human-centered framework for the ethical integration of AI into leadership practice, aiming to foster more resilient and energized workplaces.
P. K. Nanda· Leadership & Organizatio...· 0 citations
An Ethical Analytics Leadership framework is proposed in which transparency, dialogue, capacity building, and ethical governance reinforce trustworthy analytics, and explains how leaders navigate tensions between accountability and autonomy in data-intensive, highly centralized systems.
A socio-technical systems theory of systemically mediated leadership is developed, defined as a nested system-level condition and recurrent process configuration through which human actors, AI systems, organizational routines, governance institutions, and affected stakeholders jointly produce and revise direction, mean...
An integrative Trust-Transparency-Effectiveness framework connecting micro-level message design, meso-level organizational practice, and macro-level public trust outcomes is proposed, which offers strategic communicators, corporate leaders, and policymakers a structured lens for deploying generative AI responsibly whil...
It is found that AI use is associated with higher perceived negotiation efficiency, but also with lower AI system trust when automation displaces relational cues and explanations are weak, and multi-group analyses indicate stronger XAI–trust associations in the EU and stronger HIL associations in ASEAN.
Raja Mejri, Sameh Skhiri· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.