Skip to content

What a nano-GPT can (not) tell us about spoken language

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics · 0 citations · 31 references

Abstract

After the launch of ChatGPT in autumn 2022, a lot of research has focussed on the quality and near-naturalness Large Language Model-based tools present in the texts they produce. While one area of research has focussed on the similarities and differences between machine-produced and human-produced output (e.g. Berber Sardinha, 2024 ), others have explored how far such tools could process more complex tasks (e.g. Curry et al., 2024 ; Valmeekam, et al., 2023 ). While it can be assumed that ChatGPT makes use of written-to-be-spoken training material, there has been no investigation, as yet, into how far a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) algorithm is able to process (transcribed) natural, colloquial language. This research will investigate whether spoken language transcripts lead to processing difficulties; whether such generated language can be seen as a suitable reflection of natural speech; and whether machine produced texts offer new insights into the workings of language.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.