This study examines how CSRD adoption shapes sustainability leadership and organizational capabilities among ICT firms operating in Finland through a qualitative document analysis of publicly available sustainability and integrated reporting disclosures.
Abstract
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is commonly framed as a reporting mandate; however, early implementation suggests that its effects extend beyond disclosure compliance and into broader organizational transformation. This study examines how CSRD adoption shapes sustainability leadership and organizational capabilities among ICT firms operating in Finland through a qualitative document analysis of publicly available sustainability and integrated reporting disclosures. Drawing on institutional theory, the study analyses how coercive regulatory pressures interact with normative expectations concerning assurance, data credibility, and stakeholder accountability, alongside mimetic pressures associated with emerging European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). The findings identify five interrelated mechanisms through which CSRD influences organizational sustainability practices: the formalization of governance and compliance structures, the adoption of assurance as an indicator of reporting maturity, the institutionalization of double materiality and stakeholder engagement processes, the development of sustainability data infrastructures and internal control systems supported by digital reporting capabilities, and the emergence of compliance as an organizational learning process. These mechanisms reflect distinct preparation pathways and varying levels of sustainability leadership across firms. The study conceptualizes CSRD compliance as a socio-technical process through which digitally intensive firms strengthen sustainability governance, reporting capability, and strategic organizational learning.
Organizations face growing pressure to produce credible sustainability disclosures while navigating a fragmented reporting landscape. Although the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Integrated Reporting (IR), and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards are widely used, they embody different approache...
Vincent Gagné, Vicky Therrien· Journal of Applied Business...· 0 citations
Although sustainability reporting has gained prominence as a mechanism for corporate responsibility, the transparency, and credibility of disclosed sustainability information remain inadequate, especially in emerging nations where technology adoption is uneven. This study examines the influence of digital governance...
Yuxuan Du, Maalisuo Bismark Sakpiti, Inusah Sulemana· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
In an era marked by intensifying regulatory scrutiny and stakeholder activism, corporate compliance is no
longer a peripheral legal obligation but a core strategic function. This study examines how organizations can
transform compliance from a cost center into a value-creating mechanism that enhances corporate accounta...
Partha Priya Das, Moni Deepa Das, Utpal Chakraborty et al.· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting has moved from voluntary communication to regulated corporate accountability, yet the quality of adoption varies sharply. Many organisations, particularly in emerging economies, produce disclosures that satisfy formal requirements without altering strategy, governanc...
Z. Sanusi, Nur Aima Shafie, A. Ghazali et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Organizations increasingly face the challenge of integrating sustainability into strategic planning and governance systems while ensuring stakeholder participation, accountability, and long-term value creation. This study develops a stakeholder-based governance model by examining how strategic planning processes contri...
A Systematic Literature Review that analyzed 61 primary studies selected from 126 initial records reveals a clear association between cost reduction and increased productivity within the economic dimension; waste reduction reflects progress in the environmental dimension; and the improvement of quality and value delive...