Aug 2026· European Conference on Knowledge Management· 0 citations· 23 references
TL;DR
It is indicated that effectively implementing AI in management requires parallel development of employee competencies, building trust in technology and implementing ethical and supervisory standards, in which technology plays a supporting role rather than replacing the human factor.
Abstract
The study aimed to examine acceptance of, and trust in, artificial intelligence in organisational management. The study was based on a quantitative approach and conducted using a diagnostic survey. The CAWI method was used to conduct the study. The questionnaire was first verified by experts in artificial intelligence and business analysis before being made available to respondents. It included questions about respondents' experience with AI, their level of competence, the perceived benefits and threats of AI, their trust in AI-assisted decisions and their assessment of this technology's impact on organisational functioning. Trust in AI is conditional, acceptance of its use hinges on human control, transparent systems, and the ability to audit decisions. While AI is seen as conducive to the development of new management practices and innovation, its direct impact on operational efficiency remains unclear. Respondents emphasise the irreplaceable role of humans in areas requiring emotional intelligence, ethics, motivation and creativity. The conclusions indicate that effectively implementing AI in management requires parallel development of employee competencies, building trust in technology and implementing ethical and supervisory standards. These findings align with the socio-technical systems approach and the human–AI cooperation model, in which technology plays a supporting role rather than replacing the human factor.
Assessing the effects of technology reliability (RL), credibility (CR) and technical competence (TEC) on HR professionals’ trust and, subsequently, their intent to deploy AI tools reveals that technology RL, CR and TEC each enhance trust in AI.
R. Arora, Neha Kumari Siradhana· South Asian Journal of Human...· 0 citations
This study provides a novel integration of UTAUT2 with collaboration frameworks, emphasizing the theoretical link between AI adoption, trust, risk and collaboration levels, and contributes to collaboration theory by empirically showing how trust enables, and risk constrains, effective collaborative engagement in remote...
Suman Kumar, M. Moslehpour, A. Walawalkar et al.· Journal of Information, Comm...· 0 citations
Results have demonstrated that good practice in teaching and learning of AI requires responsible governance, and staff engagement, ethical practice, and access to continual AI-related information are needed to build confidence and attain institutional good practice.
Lal Mani Pokhrel· Academia Research Journal· 0 citations
Analysis of the impact of AI in decision-making processes in higher education leadership indicates that AI enjoys a positive relationship with the quality and the efficiency of strategic decisions, upon the digital literacy of leaders and the institutional preparedness.
Anwar Saeed, A. Rizvi· Aposta: Revista de Ciencias...· 0 citations
The role of AI is changing and reshaping auditing processes. However, the adoption of AI in financial auditing remains limited due to auditors' lack of expertise, resistance to change, and unclear regulatory laws. The present study uses Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) as a base to identify several functional (active...
S. Almasabi, Nidhi Singh, Danish Mehraj et al.· Journal of Global Informatio...· 0 citations
The results showed that using AI in marketing has a number of advantages, including improved efficiency in processing and interpreting consumer data and more accuracy in forecasting customer behavior, but it also presents serious obstacles, such as worries about data privacy, losing one's work, and being overly depende...