Skip to content
Open access

Meta-SPINN: meta-learned basis adaptation for parametric PDEs

Aug 2026 · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · Vol 7 · 0 citations
Physics

TL;DR

Meta-SPINN works both as a direct predictor for unseen tasks and as a task-aware initializer for subsequent single-instance residual-guided refinement, providing reusable predictions together with an interpretable visualization of how solution geometry changes across a parameter family.

Abstract

Physics-informed machine learning of parametric partial differential equation (PDE) families enables rapid prediction across varying physical conditions, yet the resulting task representations are commonly embedded in latent neural features that are difficult to interpret physically. This raises the question of whether a parametric neural PDE solver can make explicit how physical task parameters reorganize the underlying solution representation. To address this gap, we introduce Meta-Sparse, Physics-based, and partially Interpretable Neural Network (SPINN), which maps task parameters to a shallow RBF model with inspectable coefficients, centers, scales, and directional parameters. We show that, across elliptic, transport, advection–diffusion, variable-coefficient, and nonlinear PDE families, the learned bases adapt to and organize around the dominant physical solution structures, including localized forcing responses, characteristic-aligned transport trajectories, diffusion-broadened space–time corridors, and viscous shock fronts. Meta-SPINN works both as a direct predictor for unseen tasks and as a task-aware initializer for subsequent single-instance residual-guided refinement, providing reusable predictions together with an interpretable visualization of how solution geometry changes across a parameter family.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Continual-Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Parameterized Partial Differential Equations

A continual-learning physics-informed neural network (CL-PINN), which combines Bayesian-optimization-based active parameter selection, task-wise dynamic loss weighting, sparse physics-constrained replay, and an optional parameter subnetwork to improve task allocation and knowledge retention under bounded active-task ca...

Xu-Jia Chen, Xinyu Hu, Letian Chen et al. · 0 citations

Feature Interaction Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Neural Operators

This work embeds feature interaction modules derived from factorization machines (FMs) into physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and neural operator learning, to enhance model expressiveness for solution manifolds of parameterized partial differential equations (PDEs). Motivated by the second-order Taylor expansion...

Quan Gu, Hong-Xia Liu · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Multi-scale physics-informed neural networks with Fourier features for approximating time-fractional PDEs

Extensive numerical experiments demonstrate that PINNs-MSFF achieves superior accuracy, stability, and convergence, effectively capturing complex fractional dynamics, sharp localized gradients, and dispersive phase transitions where standard PINNs often fail.

Harender Kumar · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Unsupervised Adaptation of PDE Foundation Models

This work proposes an unsupervised PDE-based finetuning framework that eliminates the need for ground-truth solutions, and introduces NSLoRA, a Newton-Schulz orthogonalized variant that rebalances adaptation.

Ziye Song, Zhao Wei, Xin Yu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Equation Recast for Canonical Operator Learning Across Parametric PDEs

Equation recast is introduced, which reformulates parametric operator learning as the learning of a single canonical operator, and provides a route toward reusable neural PDE solvers combining equation-guided transfer, data efficiency, and monitorable inference.

Qi-Yun Cheng, Valentin Duruisseaux, C. Clauser et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Disentangling Attention in Deep Operator Learning: A Controlled Study of Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Architectures

Overall, query-dependent cross-attention is the most reliable mechanism, whereas branch self-attention is most useful for large, spatially complex functional inputs, whereas branch self-attention is most useful for large, spatially complex functional inputs.

Amar Alem Koric, Qi-Bang Liu, S. Koric · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.