Skip to content
Review Open access

3. Generative AI in Nutrition Education: Current Applications, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions: A Narrative Review

2026 · International Journal of Nutrition and lifestyle · Vol 6, pp. 56-61 · 0 citations

TL;DR

GenAI works best as a scalable supplement to trained nutritionists rather than as a replacement for them, according to a review of the current peer-reviewed articles.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is drastically entering every aspect of our lives, including education, training, and communication. There are many models in Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) such as “large language models (LLMs) including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot etc. This narrative review focuses on the current peer-reviewed articles (predominantly 2023–2026) on the AI applications, opportunities, challenges and future directions in the field of nutrition education. Most of these applications span three domains: professional training, direct-to-consumer dietary counselling and meal planning (chatbot-delivered advice, personalised diet plans), and public health nutrition communication. Evidence suggests that GenAI can improve nutrition learning's accessibility, scalability, personalisation, and engagement while providing dietetics educators with an affordable substitute for resource-intensive training techniques like standardised patients. However, studies consistently show limitations in accuracy, especially when it comes to calculations of calories and macronutrients, complex or comorbid clinical scenarios, and culturally specific dietary contexts. These limitations are accompanied by concerns about misleading information, algorithmic bias, dependency, data privacy, and the deterioration of critical thinking. Future directions include multimodal food-image analysis, retrieval-augmented generation based on validated nutrition databases, hybrid human-AI counselling models, and formal AI-literacy curriculum for the general public and dietetics students. According to the review, GenAI works best as a scalable supplement to trained nutritionists rather than as a replacement for them.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: Current Applications, Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a rapidly evolving technology with growing applications in healthcare education. Large language models, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Microsoft Copilot, are increasingly being used to support learning, assessment, scientific writing and educational content de...

Ivet Dzhondrova, Dimitar Kirov · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Generative artificial intelligence and large language models in sports medicine: a scoping review of applications, accuracy, and ethical implications

GenAI shows promise as a supervised decision-support tool in sports medicine, but current evidence does not support unsupervised clinical use and key challenges include hallucination risks, a lack of sport-specific validation datasets, and insufficient ethical and governance frameworks.

Ismail Dergaa, Mohamed Amine Dergaa, Mortadha Razzak et al. · 3 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Application of AI in Hypertension Health Education: Scoping Review

This first scoping review of AI applications in hypertension health education identified a mismatch between rapid advances in generative AI and the limited availability of rigorous clinical evidence.

Haoran Chen, Shenglan Xiao, Tong Wan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: from knowledge assessment to clinical reasoning and professional competence

GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.

R. Xie, Bei-En Zhang, Li-Feng Xiao · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities

Overall, AI offers substantial opportunities to improve the personalization, efficiency, and scalability of clinical nutrition practice, but its safe and effective implementation will require continued validation, careful oversight, and integration with clinical expertise.

K. Mauldin, Anthony D. Pham, Sneha Dodaballapur et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Dietitians' Views on Artificial Intelligence: An In-Depth Study

This study shows that artificial intelligence presents both risks and opportunities in the dietitian profession, and draws attention to the fact that professionals should be equipped in terms of knowledge, ethics and digital competence in this transformation process.

Elif Güner, Kübra Yuca, Emel Öztürk et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.