Skip to content
Review Open access

Environmental factors shaping cancer outcomes in Alabama: A scoping review.

Jul 2026 · Journal of cancer survivorship · 0 citations · 60 references
Medicine

TL;DR

How environmental, social, and structural factors influence cancer outcomes in Alabama are explored, using the Robison and Hudson (2014) survivorship framework, to examine how individual, healthcare provider, and system-level factors influence cancer vulnerability across communities in Alabama.

Abstract

Purpose

This scoping review explores how environmental, social, and structural factors influence cancer outcomes in Alabama. Using the Robison and Hudson (2014) survivorship framework, we examined how individual, healthcare provider, and system-level factors influence cancer vulnerability across communities in Alabama.

Methods

Following PRISMA-ScR reporting and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we identified and reviewed peer-reviewed studies published between 1995 and 2024 across five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychINFO). Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed across six key areas: food and neighborhood environment, exposure assessment and environmental measurement methods, industrial/toxic releases as exposures, legacy/historical exposures and hematologic outcomes, socioeconomic environment and cancer incidence and racial disparities, community burden, and environmental risk.

Results

Cancer disparities in Alabama are closely tied to geographic, racial, and economic factors. Communities in the Black Belt and industrial corridors face higher exposure to environmental hazards due to historical segregation and industrial development patterns. These exposures are linked to increased rates of colorectal, ovarian, and blood cancers, particularly in areas with persistent poverty and limited access to healthcare.

Conclusions

Cancer outcomes in Alabama cannot be separated from the broader social and environmental context. Understanding these connections is essential for addressing the drivers' underlying health disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Improving cancer survivorship in Alabama requires a comprehensive approach that includes environmental risk assessments, enhanced provider education, and community-driven prevention. These approaches may include local screening initiatives, environmental cleanup, and targeted outreach to high-risk populations.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Joint Toxicant and Psychosocial Exposures and Health: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Analytic Approaches.

This review highlights important methodological opportunities for future research, including integrating environmental toxicant and psychosocial exposures and applying analytical methods that better capture real-world co-exposures across the life course, to strengthen understanding of how multiple environmental and soc...

S. F. Stein, O. Halabicky, C. Giang et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Structural Racism and Head and Neck Cancer Risks and Outcomes: A Scoping Review.

Structural racism significantly contributes to disparities in HNC risk factors and treatment outcomes experienced by racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.

Anne C. Kane, Rusha Patel, Eva Kiparizoska et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Mapping global media and communication strategies in adolescent reproductive health promotion: A scoping review

The meta-analysis showed substantially higher mercury levels in rural populations than in urban populations, highlighting the need for targeted public health strategies to mitigate mercury exposure while maintaining the nutritional benefits of fish consumption.

Najma Afifa, Z. Shaluhiyah, R. Indraswari · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Digging for answers: a narrative review unearthing ground pollution and child development

A narrative review synthesizes studies published between 2020 and 2025 on the effects of ground pollution on health and behavioral development throughout childhood and highlights needs for improved exposure assessment, stronger waste management policies, and child-centered public health strategies.

Linda S. Pagani, Kianoush Harandian, Stéfanie Routhier-Guilmette et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Social Normalization of Young Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review Using Meleis' Transitions Theory.

AIM(S) To synthesize existing evidence on social normalization among young cancer survivors aged 10-24 years and to identify transition conditions and patterns of response shaping their transitional experiences. DESIGN A scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. METHODS Two reviewers inde...

Eunji Lee, Y. Heo · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Understanding the Effects of Collective Allostatic Load on Maternal Health

How pregnant Black women experience and interpret psychosocial stressors that contribute to elevated allostatic load, defined as the cumulative “wear and tear” on the body and brain due to chronic exposure, is explored.

Lucy Onyinye Efobi, Kamiliah Woodson · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.