This work introduces an analytic framework that estimates the optimal time of early stopping without the need for training and can be successfully applied to nonlinear neural networks, as illustrated in the classification MNIST example.
Abstract
Training neural networks requires balancing the trade-off between fitting the training data and achieving robust performance on unseen inputs. This ability, commonly referred to as generalizability, is determined by the gap between the empirical risk on the training set (``empirical loss'') and the expected risk over the data distribution (``generalization error''). Existing approaches typically estimate the generalization error numerically, requiring gradient descent training and an ``early stopping''strategy. In this work, we introduce an analytic framework that estimates the optimal time of early stopping without the need for training. Several works in the literature also give such analytical estimations, but they are generally based on random matrix theory and often make assumptions on the distribution of the data or the eigenvalue distribution of the covariance matrix. In contrast, our work is based on Rademacher complexity (RC) without needing such probabilistic assumptions. For both theoretical and numerical reasons, it is more relevant to express RC with the L1- norm rather than with the L2-norm. We focus on the case of linear models and the problem of linear regression. Thanks to the ``linear probing''method, our results can, however, be successfully applied to nonlinear neural networks, as illustrated in the classification MNIST example.
This work shows that early stopping can overcome suboptimality: in a Gaussian mixture model with label-flipping noise, GD stopped at an appropriate oracle time achieves minimax-optimal excess zero-one risk for covariance spectra with fast and continuous decay, including polynomial and exponential spectral decays.
Alex Buna, S. Liu, Patrick Rebeschini· 0 citations
A more flexible framework in which a predictive model determines the nominal distribution and a separate model estimates a data-dependent radius is developed, which treats calibration as a practical mechanism for reliable decision making rather than a universal guarantee of improved optimization performance.
A generalized data processing inequality is formulated, requiring the constrained Bayes risk of a joint distribution to lower bound the constrained Bayes risk on the stochastically modified distribution, regardless of the choice of distribution, to be equivalent to a set containment condition on a specific function set...
Laura Iacovissi, Rabanus Derr, Robert C. Williamson· 0 citations
Experimental results demonstrate that proposed Bayesian domain weighting method could achieve stable and efficient domain weights learning, and identifies optimal mixtures while consuming substantially less data than search-based function-fitting methods, revitalizing optimization-based domain weighting for large-scale...
Xiang Yuan, Kai-Qing Lei, Zhenyu Jin et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The findings corroborate the concern that standard resampling methods often yield biased GE estimates in nonstandard settings, underscoring the importance of tailored GE estimation.
R. Hornung, Malte Nalenz, Lennart Schneider et al.· Statistical Science· 0 citations
Theoretical scaling laws from linear regression to multiclass classification to multiclass classification are extended, while connecting to empirical scaling laws observed in large-scale neural networks.
Konstantinos Christopher Tsiolis, Denny Wu, Christos Thrampoulidis et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.