Skip to content
Open access

Thrombin-Antithrombin Complexes and sICAM-1 Are Associated With In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients With Inflammatory Storm

Jan 2026 · Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis · Vol 32 · 0 citations · 21 references
Medicine

Abstract

Aim To evaluate whether endothelial activation (soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, sICAM-1) and thrombotic activation (thrombin-antithrombin complexes, TAT) markers provide prognostic information beyond standard inflammatory markers for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients with cytokine storm. Materials and methods Prospective cohort study of 47 patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted November 2020–February 2021 to District Hospital, Debica, Poland. Patients were stratified by cytokine storm profile (CRP >50 mg/L or IL-6 >30 pg/mL) and survival status. Blood biomarkers included CRP, IL-6, sICAM-1, TAT, d-dimer, and antiphospholipid antibodies. Results Mortality rate was 40.4% (19/47 patients). Among patients with cytokine storm, TAT and sICAM-1 levels were significantly higher in non-survivors versus survivors (TAT: 15.4 (12.2–23.6) ng/mL vs. 11.6 (11.0–14.8) ng/mL, p=0.037; sICAM-1: 12.0 (5.6–35.3) ng/mL vs. 4.3 (2.5–23.9) ng/ml, p=0.033), whereas d-dimer and anticardiolipin IgM did not differentiate mortality outcomes. Elevated TAT was detected in 100% of patients, d-dimer in 93.6%, anticardiolipin IgM in 40.4%, and sICAM-1 in 21.3%. In the multivariable exploratory model based on Firth’s logistic regression, TAT ≥12.14 ng/mL and sICAM-1 ≥4.0 ng/mL emerged as potential independent predictors of mortality (OR: 6.27, 95% CI: 1.31–29.99 and OR: 8.68, 95% CI: 1.22–62.15, respectively). Traditional prognostic factors (diabetes on insulin, and blood desaturation) also discriminated poor outcomes. Conclusions sICAM-1 and TAT were associated with in-hospital mortality within the high-risk subgroup of COVID-19 patients with cytokine storm, suggesting prognostic information beyond conventional inflammatory markers and d-dimer. Given the limited sample size, these exploratory findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger, multicentre cohorts before informing risk stratification.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.