Skip to content
Review

Domain generalization and synthetic data in object detection: the enabler, the probe, and the gap

Sep 2026 · 2 citations · 84 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is argued that future research requires representation-aware methods that explicitly address both localization and classification under domain shift, and that future research requires representation-aware methods that explicitly address both localization and classification under domain shift.

Abstract

Object detection models often experience performance degradation when deployed under distribution shifts, caused by for example changes in weather type, operational environment, or object appearance. Domain Generalization (DG) aims to develop models that remain robust under such shifts and generalize well to unseen domains. DG research specifically focused on object detection models is scarce, although these models face additional challenges around localization and multi-scale representations. Synthetic data is a promising tool to support in DG, by enabling large-scale generation of diverse new samples. In this paper, we present an object detection-centric review of DG and examine the role of synthetic data from three complementary perspectives. First, synthetic data acts as an enabler of DG through diversification and alignment strategies that aim to improve robustness to distribution shifts. Second, it serves as a probe that enables controlled experimentation to identify and understand failure modes. Third, we discuss the synthetic-to-real gap, a particularly challenging form of domain shift that arises when models trained on synthetic imagery are deployed on real-world data. Through reviewing these perspectives, we identify limitations of current DG approaches for object detection and argue that future research requires representation-aware methods that explicitly address both localization and classification under domain shift.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

GIFT: Representation Geometry Matters for Single-Domain Generalized Object Detection

Single-Domain Generalized Object Detection (S-DGOD) aims to generalize from a single source domain to unseen domains under distribution shifts. Existing efforts mainly focus on simulating unseen domains or suppressing domain-specific factors. However, they largely overlook the intrinsic generalization capability embedd...

Yin Zhang, Yao-Yue Zheng, Yong-Qiang Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Nov 2026

Domain-Aware Feature Distillation for Cross-Domain Object Detection

Self-training with teacher-generated pseudo-labels has driven notable progress in cross-domain object detection. However, most existing methods primarily rely on output-level supervision, while overlooking the transfer of intermediate representations. Although feature distillation appears to be a natural solution, dire...

Rui-Qing Wang, Yang Xu, Zhi-Hui Wei et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

JMT-YOLO: Multi-task Domain Adaptation via Segmentation-Guided Consistency Learning

Domain adaptive object detection (DAOD) aims to reduce performance degradation due to distribution shifts between training (source) and testing (target) datasets. However, owing to insufficient modeling of fine-grained features and limited instance-level alignment, existing approaches become less effective under comple...

Zhen-Hua Yu, Jia-Hao Zhang, Wen-Chao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

InCLAD: A Continual Learning Benchmark for Industrial Visual Anomaly Detection

Industrial anomaly detection benchmarks have advanced rapidly, yet they remain largely static and therefore underrepresent deployment settings in which inspection systems must be extended from one industrial component to another over time. In our setting, continual industrial anomaly detection is framed as a task-incre...

L. Marcjan, D. Wilk-Kołodziejczyk, Roberto Corizzo · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Visual-Only and Vision–Language Industrial Anomaly Detection Under Benchmarks and Limited-Data Settings

Industrial anomaly detection remains challenging in manufacturing quality inspection because defects are often subtle, spatially sensitive, and costly to annotate. These constraints have motivated a recent shift from visual-only models toward vision–language approaches that can represent anomalies more flexibly. Howeve...

Atefeh Gilvari, Rajeev Verma, N. Kar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.