Skip to content
Open access

Cash conversion cycles and financial flexibility under economic shocks: evidence from emerging markets

Aug 2026 · SN Business & Economics · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 30 references

Abstract

This study examines whether the cash conversion cycle (CCC) supports financial flexibility or instead increases firm vulnerability under economic policy uncertainty (EPU), and tests whether the COVID-19 pandemic altered this relationship for firms with different pre-existing working-capital structures. The study uses a balanced panel of 391 non-financial Indian listed firms over 2014–2024 (4,301 firm-year observations), drawn from the CMIE Prowess database. Firm fixed-effects and random-effects models are estimated with default, firm-clustered, and Driscoll-Kraay standard errors; a difference-in-differences design with firm and year fixed effects is used to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic as an exogenous shock, with firms classified into treatment (above-median pre-pandemic CCC) and control (below-median) groups. The analysis is supplemented with an event-study test of the parallel-trends assumption, a placebo test, a lagged-CCC specification, and a dynamic-panel system GMM model. CCC is not robustly significant for return on assets (ROA) once firm-clustered standard errors are applied (p = 0.264), though a one-year-lagged CCC is significantly positive for both ROA and ROE (p < 0.05); CCC is not significant for return on equity (ROE) in the static specification. EPU is positively associated with ROA at conventional or near-conventional levels across specifications. The CCC × EPU interaction is consistently negative but reaches significance only in the dynamic system-GMM specification for ROA (p = 0.025). An event-study test does not reject parallel pre-trends, and the difference-in-differences and placebo estimates show no significant differential effect for high-CCC firms at the onset of the pandemic, though a significant gap emerges by 2024. Working-capital efficiency appears to operate as a gradual, lagged operational channel rather than an immediate source of profitability or crisis vulnerability. Managers should treat CCC as a medium-term operational lever rather than a short-term crisis response tool, and should prioritise short-term liquidity buffers - proxied here by the current ratio, the most consistently significant predictor of ROA throughout this study. Policymakers should prioritise macroeconomic stability, since EPU itself shows a positive association with ROA, consistent with well-managed firms being better placed to absorb policy uncertainty. The study combines a continuous, time-varying uncertainty measure (EPU) with a discrete exogenous shock (COVID-19) within a single firm-level identification strategy, and is, to our knowledge, among the first studies of Indian working-capital management to combine static fixed-effects estimation with an event-study test of parallel trends, a placebo test, and a system-GMM dynamic-panel specification within one design.

Read PDF