Decentralized lending lacks a credit bureau: a borrower's capacity to repay must be inferred entirely from public on-chain activity, without income verification or a liability record. This paper presents zLend, a deployed cash-flow underwriting framework that reconstructs a wallet's daily balance history from raw token transfers and derives short-duration repayment-capacity signals from it. The reconstruction is performed twice per wallet, once restricted to a fixed stablecoin basket and once over all fungible transfers, on the premise that a wallet's total token holdings and its liquid, spendable balance are distinct quantities whose conflation misprices risk. From each series we derive liquidity coverage against a fixed loan size, cash-flow volatility and regularity, a drawdown-and-recovery statistic adapted from quantitative finance, and a recurring-counterparty detector that identifies salary-like payment cadence from transfer timing alone. The two views are then compared: a wallet with large aggregate holdings whose stablecoin reserve rarely covers the loan size is flagged as a liquidity mismatch irrespective of total wealth. We specify the pipeline formally, document the golden-master methodology used to verify a cross-language production migration to numerical tolerance 1e-9, and characterize the tier function's parameter sensitivity with an independent reimplementation validated to exact agreement (78 of 78 field assertions) against the deployed system's reference fixtures. Tier assignment is governed predominantly by the reference loan size, with four of six reference wallets changing tier across loan sizes from USD 10 to USD 25,000; the drawdown and coverage criteria bind on disjoint wallets, so neither subsumes the other; and no criterion in the tier rule is inert. zLend is deployed in production, informing real lending decisions via third-party API integrations.
A venue-agnostic on-chain credit architecture for that capital layer and an endogenous model of its capital market are developed, showing that layered protection reduces but does not eliminate Senior loss, that 5x leverage materially increases capital pressure, and that market-maker capacity can raise aggregate shortfa...
Variable prepaid forward contracts and option collars paired with margin loans offer similar economics on concentrated equity: downside protection and day-one liquidity in exchange for capped upside. The key difference is tax treatment. A variable prepaid forward is a single contract whose gain or loss is computed on a...
Brent Sullivan, Roy Haya, Ralph Drybrough· The journal of wealth manage...· 0 citations
Whether a defensible residual-value curve for data-centre accelerators can be built from public information, to build one, and to test how sensitive disclosed 2025 structures are to getting it wrong are determined.
Benedict Amissah-Ocran, Mark Tettey Ayumu· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
This paper investigates the optimal design of information disclosure at debt rollover to maximize an entrepreneur’s ex ante borrowing capacity and social welfare. We develop a model where an entrepreneur secures a startup loan for project experimentation and must refinance for production. Borrowing capacity is limited...
Axient, a physically backed margin layer for binary event markets that separates leverage maturity from claim maturity and makes the hard-flat decision under explicit execution uncertainty, is specified.
FinTech operates as a stable amplifying conduit rather than a cushion, transmitting structural repricing at horizons that a daily monitoring dashboard is least able to observe, and should be treated as a systemic-transmission node.
Yatharth Kumar, Nameera Aziz· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.