LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost, and is the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together.
Abstract
Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata. We present ExtractBench, a benchmark for schema-guided extraction and, to our knowledge, the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together. The evaluation system contains 4,869 pages across 370 enterprise documents, 8 business domains, and 67 document types, with clear tags differentiating their challenge scenarios. The scalable schema and ground-truth curation pipeline combines independent-system agreement for real documents, known values for synthetic lists, and human verification for forms. We report order-insensitive value F1 for value accuracy, plus two grounding metrics for source traceability: word- and page-level F1. Commercial VLMs perform well on short documents but often truncate record lists on long ones, while coding agents retain higher accuracy at much higher cost. LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost. Dataset and evaluation code are available on \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/llamaindex/ExtractBench}{HuggingFace} and \href{https://github.com/run-llama/ExtractBench}{GitHub}.
Long-document question-answering experiments show that human-verified TOC hierarchies and contextual relationships improve reasoning, with their combination providing complementary benefits.
Yuefeng Zou, Yichen Lu, Jingxiao Yang et al.· 0 citations
Enterprise guideline documents are heterogeneous and multimodal, combining narrative text, complex tables, and embedded images. Existing LLM and VLM systems face hallucinated content, table structure degradation, and lack governed workflows extending beyond extraction to validation and artifact generation. This leaves enterprises to perform this manually, consuming 2-3 days per document. To address this, we introduce GUIDE, a governed multi-agent framework built on a shared versioned rule store with schema-validated inter-agent contracts and end-to-end provenance tracking. Six specialized agents handle parsing, VLM-driven extraction, consistency checking, evaluation, human-in-the-loop (HITL) escalation, and persona-tailored artifact synthesis. Evaluated on 120 real-world enterprise guideline documents, GUIDE achieves 96% document success, extracts 3,896 rules with 71.4% auto-approved, produces 812 deployment-ready artifacts, and reduces turnaround to 40-125 minutes per document.
Shivali Dalmia, Sumukha Thoppanahalli, Mohammadreza Sediqin et al.· 0 citations
Large language models extract entities and relationships from unstructured documents fluently but inconsistently: type vocabularies fracture across documents, the same person surfaces under several name variants, relationships duplicate, and distinct individuals who share a name risk silent conflation. This paper presents the design, implementation, and empirical refinement of a production extraction layer that converts a live document stream into a validated knowledge graph aligned to a formal ontology. The system consumes document metadata from Kafka, routes PDF, spreadsheet, Office, and image content through handlers built for each format, and extracts entities and relationships in two passes using a locally hosted Qwen3.5-9B model tuned on the ontology. Its distinguishing component is ontology-guided extraction: the relevant slice of a curated ontology is retrieved live from a graph database by embedding similarity and injected into the extraction prompt, reducing catalog overhead by about 94 percent relative to static domain slices. Extracted results then pass through a refinement pipeline of five stages: deterministic cleaning, merging across chunks, a second pass for relationships, six deduplication algorithms that require no model inference, and an embedding resolution subsystem whose conflict guard no similarity score can override. Evaluation on intelligence corpora improved search recall from roughly 70 to 95 percent with no false merges, and corrected seven classes of silent quality defect, ranging from a bug that truncated source text by a single character to the systematic duplication of entities that carried title prefixes.
Vaibhav Dangaich, Kevin Lewis, Kundeshwar Pundalik· 0 citations
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enables large language models to incorporate external knowledge during generation, improving factual grounding and domain adaptability. However, existing RAG pipelines assume that evidence retrieved from multiple repositories can be ranked globally using a single similarity function. While suitable for open-domain retrieval, this assumption breaks down in enterprise document generation, where heterogeneous knowledge bases (such as policies, regulations, technical documentation, and departmental guidelines) serve distinct roles and must be jointly represented in the generated document. As a result, global ranking often produces unbalanced context dominated by a subset of sources, leading to incomplete enterprise drafts. To address this limitation, we propose W-RAG, a source-aware retrieval framework that performs ontology-guided retrieval, local ranking within each knowledge base, and source-level weighting to regulate evidence composition. We further introduce a new dataset for retrieval-grounded enterprise document generation spanning multiple document types and industry domains. Experiments show that standard RAG pipelines struggle on this task, while W-RAG significantly improves document coverage and generation quality.
Hridya Dhulipala, Rajesh Ombase, Michael Wang et al.· 0 citations
A design-oriented framework, an evaluation protocol, and a set of open problems for governed structured-data agents are proposed for retrieval semantics, authorization, intent recognition, entity resolution, evaluation, failure modes, and latency.
Key personnel turnover creates knowledge gaps in document-based service organizations, where information is distributed across technical specifications, operational databases, and team discussions. This study develops a multi-source Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) based Question Answering (QA) system that automatically integrates heterogeneous knowledge sources through a unified source parameter. Using the Adapter Pattern, the system converts PDF/TXT documents and PostgreSQL tables into a common representation, builds a FAISS vector index, retrieves relevant context, and generates grounded answers with Gemini 2.5 Flash. Evaluation employs eight metrics and three composite scores: Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness (KTE), Multi-Source Retrieval Score (MSRS), and Answer Quality Index (AQI). Experiments were conducted on the BOND_SYS dataset using 25 Indonesian questions covering specification documents, an 8-table PostgreSQL database, and 908 developer discussion messages. Results show perfect retrieval performance (Precision@K = 1.000; MRR = 1.000) across all scenarios. The full hybrid configuration achieves the highest Overall score (0.373), while Scenario C records the highest MSRS (0.825). Scenario E obtains ROUGE-L = 0.181 and BLEU-1 = 0.196 using five manually curated reference answers. Two baseline comparisons further support this contribution: a zero-shot LLM without retrieval correctly answered only 8% of questions, while a BM25 keyword-search baseline, competitive on single-source scenarios, was outperformed on cross-referencing tasks, underscoring the added value of dense multi-source retrieval. The findings demonstrate that integrating formal documents, structured databases, and discussion logs enhances knowledge transfer and question answering for organizational support and employee onboarding.
Krisna Dwi Setya Adi, Ivan Michael Siregar· Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian· 0 citations