This work proposes a co-evolution roadmap for physical intelligence centered on theembodied brain, a long-term model target for integrating multimodal context, comparing candidate interventions, and issuing state-transition or capability requests rather than direct actuator commands.
Abstract
Artificial general intelligence ultimately requires agents that can reason and act in the physical world. Action models, vision-language-action policies, and world models have advanced this goal, while World Action Models (WAMs) are particularly promising because they connect candidate interventions with predicted consequences. However, progress remains fragmented: models use incompatible action spaces and prediction targets, datasets and tasks follow different conventions, and runtime systems expose limited interfaces for reuse and evaluation. We review the evolution toward WAMs and organize these limitations into three coupled gaps: model roles and representations, objectives and standardization, and system composition. Building on this analysis, we propose a co-evolution roadmap for physical intelligence centered on the \emph{embodied brain}, a long-term model target for integrating multimodal context, comparing candidate interventions, and issuing state-transition or capability requests rather than direct actuator commands. WAMs provide promising prototypes for its predictive functions, while a physical harness grounds model outputs through tools, controllers, verification, and trace logging. Shared contracts align heterogeneous models, data, tasks, and embodiments, and closed-loop post-training converts verified interaction into reusable experience. Together, these components define a modular physical-intelligence stack for adaptive and self-improving embodied agents.
A comprehensive review of VLA models for Embodied AI from an action‐generation perspective and proposes an action‐generation‐centered taxonomy that categorizes VLA models into three paradigms: direct policy learning, generative action modeling, and reasoning‐guided modeling.
Ning Xiong, Mingle Xu, Wei Chen et al.· Journal of Field Robotics· 0 citations
Results demonstrate that model-external structured state maintenance and closed-loop agentic decision making can effectively extend the local control capabilities of WAMs into embodied task execution that is plannable, verifiable, and recoverable.
Zhao-Peng Gu, Bing-Ke Zhu, Tianxin Lin et al.· 5 citations
World models enable a predictive substrate for planning and action, yet existing formulations merely answer a physical question: what/where it is, and how will it evolve. Human behavior, however, is driven by hidden mental state (what a person believes, wants, intends, feels, and considers socially permissible), so a m...
For robots to operate reliably in real-world environments, they need to perceive their surroundings, act, and reason about the consequences of those actions. Rapid progress in the domains of representation learning, VLA models, and world models has significantly enhanced the capabilities of robot learning systems, enab...
Shaunak A. Mehta, Ananya Hazarika, Haochen Zhang et al.· Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.· 0 citations
PILOT (Physical Inference for Latent Optimized Trajectories) bridges the gap between high-level physical condition evolution and low-level action trajectory generation within the Action Model, creating a structural bottleneck while weakening the predictive capability of world evolution modeling for action generation.
Xiangkai Ma, Yue Ma, Junjie Wang et al.· 0 citations
This Review synthesizes recent progress in Embodied AI and articulate Intent-Driven Embodied Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI) as a system-level organizing framework in which intent functions as an explicit, revisable, and verifiable mediating construct between human goals, environmental constraints, and agent behavior.
Nanning Zheng· National Science Review· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.