HarnessCompass is proposed, a novel automatic harness evolution framework built around constrained evolution, proactive feedback, and component-wise optimization that improves Pass@1 from 54\% to 66\% in only 5 evolution iterations, outperforming AHE in both effectiveness and evolution efficiency.
Abstract
Harness design plays a critical role in agent performance by shaping how large language models (LLMs) perceive, reason over, and act within executable environments. Recent work has proposed automatic harness evolution, which iteratively improves the harness from agent--environment interactions. However, existing methods often overfit to the evolution tasks, rely exclusively on trajectory-derived signals, and optimize harness components jointly, causing interference across components. We propose HarnessCompass, a novel automatic harness evolution framework built around constrained evolution, proactive feedback, and component-wise optimization. HarnessCompass first enforces global constraints on evolution, restricting modifications to task-agnostic harness changes that generalize beyond the evolution tasks. It then augments trajectory-derived evidence with proactive first-person feedback from the agent about harness usage, yielding richer signals for evolution. Finally, it decouples the optimization of different harness components before consolidating them into a unified harness, reducing cross-component interference while preserving component synergy. On SWE-bench Verified with GPT-5.4, HarnessCompass improves Pass@1 from 54\% to 66\% in only 5 evolution iterations, outperforming AHE in both effectiveness and evolution efficiency. In addition, the evolved harness transfers effectively to held-out tasks and other models, demonstrating substantially stronger generalization than prior automatic harness evolution methods.
To the authors' knowledge, JIT-Agent is the first model purpose-built for just-in-time harness generation, establishing harness intelligence as a trainable, transferable, and compounding dimension of agent capability orthogonal to model scaling.
Gui-Bin Zhang, Leo Lu, Fang-Zhou Xie et al.· 14 citations
It is found that generated harnesses remain substantially behind mature human-engineered references on code and on search and research, while matching or exceeding the selected references on writing and machine-learning experimentation, with large variation in execution cost.
Yu-Hao Wu, Jing-Yuan Zhang, Jia-Jun Shi et al.· 8 citations
Co-Harness is introduced, a framework that jointly optimizes the agent harness and model parameters during post-training and suggests that joint harness and model optimization is an effective way to improve agents beyond fixed-harness post-training.
Zhengyu Chen, Teng Xiao, Huaisheng Zhu et al.· arXiv.org· 4 citations
HELIX provides an auditable interface for studying model-harness co-evolution for recursive self-improvement and expands current capability and creates learning signal for the next model; model updates motivate the next round of harness evolution.
HarnessLens is introduced, a budget-aware framework for automated harness evolution that jointly explores the task space and user-configurable components, derives candidate modifications from execution trajectories, and selectively verifies each candidate on behavior-relevant tasks using an attributable-evidence gate.
The proposed AutoSaddler, an automatic harness optimization framework that formulates harness improvement as an offline learning problem and iteratively updates the harness using failure signals from mini-batches, suggests that automatic harness optimization is a promising path toward more performant and reliable agent...
Sungho Park, Wonjoong Kim, Rongyuan Tan et al.· 15 citations· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.