Jul 2026· Universal Library of Innovative Research and Studies· Vol 3, pp. 01-07· 0 citations· 1 references
TL;DR
This review examines phased transition patterns from technology-siloed structures toward cross-functional engineering teams, and identifies structural limits of silo-based delivery, compares transition mechanisms, and develops a practical interpretation of staged ownership transfer.
Abstract
Software organizations often keep frontend, backend, mobile, infrastructure, and quality-assurance engineers in separate units long after product delivery has begun to depend on joint ownership across these domains. The separation protects specialist knowledge, yet it creates delays when one feature moves through several queues before release. This review examines phased transition patterns from technology-siloed structures toward cross-functional engineering teams. It draws on recent software engineering literature on agile teamwork, DevOps structures, continuous delivery, platform teams, scaled autonomy, communities of practice, and human factors in agile projects. The method combines comparative source analysis, conceptual synthesis, typological classification, and analytical generalization. The review identifies structural limits of silo-based delivery, compares transition mechanisms, and develops a practical interpretation of staged ownership transfer. The proposed approach links cross-functional restructuring with federated governance, enabling teams, quality practices embedded in development, and monitoring indicators covering flow, reliability, collaboration, capability, and sustainability.
Cross-functional teams are a central organizational model in contemporary software engineering fueled by practices such as Agile development, DevOps and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD). Although widely adopted, there is limited empirical support for the effectiveness of these practices in cross-fun...
M. Qasim, Ali Zamil Sharhan Al-Maliki, Murtadha Al-Maliki et al.· 2026 6th International Confe...· 0 citations
This study employs a qualitative case study approach based on project documentation, issue tracking logs, sprint reports, and communication records to examine the application of Agile methodology in a global ServiceNow system migration from the Vancouver to Washington release within a highly regulated multinational tob...
Tajghina Qatrunnada Firdaus, Teguh Raharjo, Anita Nur Fitriani· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
A literature review of Agile methodologies from 2001 to 2025 is presented, systematically examining their evolution, cross-sectoral diffusion, and key adaptations, and identifies critical gaps in the literature and outlines future research directions.
Majid Al-Nabae, Norshahrizan Nordin, Abdulwadod S. A. Hassan et al.· Global Social Science and Hu...· 0 citations
It is suggested that product line engineering (PLE) provides a structural mechanism for enabling meaningful agility in complex cyber‐physical systems by organizing solutions into stable core assets and controlled variability that explicitly respects physical and organizational constraints.
The INCOSE future of systems engineering (FuSE) initiative is a collaborative effort to realize the
Systems Engineering Vision 2035
, pivoting from traditional, process‐driven methods to a more agile approach working with the different engineering and systems engineering disciplines, It focuses on addressing comp...
A comprehensive mapping of the complete productization lifecycle—from internal prototype through licensed commercial deployment—is absent from the synthesized literature on architectural practice, with recommendations for open-standard mandates and SME-targeted digitalization programs.