This work develops an inverse optimization approach to jointly learn the decision-maker's preferences and the decision rules governing their choices, which leads to better predictions and greater flexibility in capturing and replicating expert decision making.
Abstract
Understanding how experts make decisions and being able to transfer that knowledge is important, especially in complex engineering applications. It is highly valuable for training novices, improving the performance of human-machine systems, and potentially enabling fully autonomous systems that perform as well as human experts. However, an expert's decision-making strategy, developed through years of experience, is often not directly accessible, since the implicit preferences and decision rules involved can be difficult to specify explicitly. This has motivated the use of observed decisions made by the expert to learn an interpretable model that captures the expert's decision-making process. In this work, we develop an inverse optimization approach to jointly learn the decision-maker's preferences (or perceived costs) and the decision rules governing their choices. We demonstrate the general applicability of our approach using three case studies that consider a shift assignment problem, a production planning problem, and a real-world routing problem, respectively. Across these case studies, modeling both perceived costs and decision rules leads to better predictions, highlighting the value of the proposed framework and its greater flexibility in capturing and replicating expert decision making.
This paper proposes a biobjective formulation that balances prediction accuracy and cost minimization, termed decision-driven regularization, which is shown to be numerically superior to other benchmarks, such as ordinary least squares, random forest, XGBoost, SPO+, perturbation gradient, and learning and rank, in the...
G. Loke, Qin-Shen Tang, Yangge Xiao et al.· INFORMS journal on computing· 1 citation
This study shows that inverse optimization can transform tacit human expertise into interpretable models, enabling more accurate and trusted decision-support tools for complex industrial systems.
Shivi Dixit, Rishabh Gupta, Adam Kelloway et al.· Chemical engineering researc...· 0 citations
It is shown that a key factor is the error correlation structure between human and AI predictions, and when the AI's prediction errors are negatively correlated with those of the human, the decision maker can construct robust strategies which guarantee improvements in expected utility.
A Machine-based Decision Maker that replaces human DMs with pre-trained machine learning models capable of performing the key iMCDM tasks automatically and a Bench-iMCDM framework for benchmarking iMCDM procedures is proposed.
Deepanshu Yadav, Kalyanmoy Deb· Annual Conference on Genetic...· 2 citations
This paper proposes a stochastic machine learning-based decision-maker: pMachine-DM, which emulates human preference articulation using two stochastic ANNs, enabling systematic and reproducible benchmarking without involving human DMs.
This work proposes an integrated learning and robust optimization (ILRO) framework, where a robust decision problem is used both to define the training problem (termed the RSPO loss problem), and to produce the deployed decision, which achieves both robustness and learning-decision alignment.
Chengpeng Tan, Yu-Chen Mao, Shu-Ming Wang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.