Skip to content
Conference Open access

Adaptive Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy and Survey

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 0 citations · 49 references

TL;DR

A unified view of ARD in RL is provided by introducing a taxonomy, organized by the primary driver of the reward variation, that distinguishes external-feedback-driven reward updates from reward adaptations driven by endogenous within-run signals and those conditioned on exogenous context signals.

Abstract

Adaptive Reward Design (ARD) is becoming a fundamental component for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents, as they are deployed in increasingly complex settings where a single static reward across all phases of learning is rarely sufficient. Yet, ARD is rarely studied as a coherent topic: Relevant ideas are dispersed across reward shaping, curriculum learning, intrinsic motivation, non-stationary objectives, and preference- or feedback-based learning, which obscures conceptual connections and complicates method selection. This survey provides a unified view of ARD in RL by introducing a taxonomy, organized by the primary driver of the reward variation. The taxonomy distinguishes external-feedback-driven reward updates from reward adaptations driven by endogenous within-run signals and those conditioned on exogenous context signals. Using explicit assignment rules, we place work published between 2010 and 2025 within this taxonomy. By synthesizing typical RL settings and domains at the driver level, we simplify the method selection in ARD. Further, we describe the evolution and current trends of ARD and conclude by outlining promising future research directions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

A Unified Framework for Dynamic Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning

A unified analytical framework for comparing dynamic reward shaping and neighbouring adaptive reward mechanisms is introduced, which distinguishes parametric revision from state-dependent variation, separates additive shaping from reward replacement and reward-adjacent guidance, and organises existing methods along tem...

Fouad Bahrpeyma · 0 citations
2025

LaRes: Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning with LLM-based Adaptive Reward Search

This work proposes LaRes, a novel hybrid framework that achieves efficient policy learning through reward function search by leveraging large language models to generate the reward function population, guiding RL in policy learning.

Pengyi Li, Hongyao Tang, Jinbin Qiao et al. · 7 citations
Jul 2026

Meta-Learned Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

MeRLa (Meta-Learned Reward Shaping), a principled framework that meta-learns a task-aware shaping function across auxiliary tasks before RLHF training, is introduced, providing theoretical guarantees for policy invariance, analyze representation drift sensitivity, and formally address incentive misalignment from entrop...

Yu-An Chu · 0 citations
Open access 2026

GCR-RL: Gradient Control Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning

This work introduces Gradient Control Rewards (GCR), an interpretable, control-inspired reward-design methodology for accelerating agent training by modulating the reward signal based on the temporal dynamics of system error, Inspired by classical control theory.

Anas Aburaya, H. Selamat, M. Muslim et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey

A coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL is provided to provide researchers and practitioners with a coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL and to highlight promising directions for future inquiry.

Weijia Wu, Chen Gao, Joya Chen et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback

This work develops LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Preference feedback, a novel framework where an agent interactively learns from the preferences of multiple humans to learn optimal multi-objective policies.

Manith Adikari, Bei Peng, Samuele Vinanzi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.