EgoExo-Next, a visual-option benchmark for dynamic visual-state reasoning, where models must identify how an observed action trajectory subsequently appears rather than predict only an action label or textual description, suggests that current VLMs remain substantially limited in dynamic visual-state reasoning.
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly evaluated for egocentric and cross-view video reasoning, yet existing benchmarks largely focus on semantic event understanding, temporal relations, or correspondence between already observed views, leaving their ability to reason directly about future visual states underexplored. We introduce EgoExo-Next, a visual-option benchmark for dynamic visual-state reasoning, where models must identify how an observed action trajectory subsequently appears rather than predict only an action label or textual description. EgoExo-Next contains 2,503 human-curated four-choice questions from six public egocentric and ego--exo video sources and comprises four interconnected subtasks that evaluate egocentric next-state prediction, bidirectional ego--exo state correspondence, exocentric next-state prediction, and their composition in Ego-to-Exo Next-State. Extensive evaluation of proprietary, open-source, and spatial reasoning VLMs reveals a substantial human--model gap, with the best model achieving 43.81\% average accuracy compared with 98.55\% for humans, and the largest degradation occurring on the composed Ego-to-Exo task. These results suggest that current VLMs remain substantially limited in dynamic visual-state reasoning, particularly when temporal progression and cross-view reasoning must be composed. The benchmark is publicly available at \url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/yutongli2024/EgoExo-Next}.
The results establish goal-conditioned state comparison as an explicit formulation of egocentric spatiotemporal reasoning for task-progress understanding as part of a unified framework for diagnosing and improving order-robust task-progress understanding.
Xiao-Da Yang, Can Wang, Yu-Xiang Liu et al.· 0 citations
EgoPathBench, a dataset and five-task benchmark for first-person waypoint decision-making, and Fine-tuning Qwen 3.5 4B on the released training split improves all four reported evaluations across three external spatial benchmarks, with gains of 1.4--9.6 points.
SpatialMind is introduced, a metric-scale VLM for spatial reasoning and future prediction that substantially outperforms both general and spatially specialized models on the authors' benchmark while achieving competitive zero-shot performance on VSI-Bench, OSI-Bench, and VLM4D.
Fei-Ran Wang, Xiao-Qi Wang, Zi-Wei Li et al.· 0 citations
Answering complex spatial reasoning questions from egocentric video requires determining what evidence is needed, acquiring targeted observations, and combining them through multiple reasoning steps. Existing vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to perform this process reliably. Agentic systems address this challenge...
Chaoyu Li, Arka Sadhu, Yu-Liang Li et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action models benefit from the understanding and reasoning capabilities of pretrained vision-language models, but action-only supervision provides limited grounding in world dynamics. Conversely, world-action models inherit spatiotemporal priors from video generation models, yet remain limited in semant...
Wen-Xuan Song, Jia-Yi Chen, Jing-Bo Wang et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1
This work proposes FOCAL-VLA, a framework that combines subtask-guided geometry distillation with implicit world modeling to learn representations of current spatial structure and future interaction dynamics, and shows that FOCAL-VLA outperforms baselines on both simulation benchmarks and real-world manipulation tasks.
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.