Modulation is introduced as a setting where the persona context is already embedded in the content being manipulated, requiring control methods to amplify or suppress a trait already present rather than inject it from scratch.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can adopt distinct personas to tune their semantics, expertise, and perspective to different users and tasks. Precise control over these traits is critical to ensure safety and reliability in model behavior. Existing methods like activation steering and prompt-based persona induction reduce a persona to a single dominant direction, missing the finer, nested traits that emerge only once that dominant signal is factored out. We introduce modulation as a setting where the persona context is already embedded in the content being manipulated, requiring control methods to amplify or suppress a trait already present rather than inject it from scratch. PaSS is an inference-time control paradigm that models personas as multi-dimensional subspaces in a model's latent space without supervised contrastive examples. The persona subspaces are extracted via iterative concept erasure and applied to modulate persona-guided generation without retraining. To extract this subspace, we use Iterative Nullspace Projections (INLP) to linearly and iteratively isolate persona-specific directions. We causally evaluate six personas against diverse tasks like MATH-500, TinyAlpaca, GSM8K, and IFEval, showing that discriminative, iterative subspace extraction captures diverse traits underlying a given persona, enabling stronger and larger modulation than single-direction additive methods, while maintaining content fidelity. We further study individual peeled directions within each subspace to uncover the distinct aspects of persona behavior they encode. Overall, we show that persona subspaces offer a controllable, interpretable, and generalizable framework for modulating LLM behavior without sacrificing task performance.
Common methods for monitoring features in large language models (LLMs) such as linear probes and sparse autoencoders (SAEs) assume that features maintain a consistent representation across contexts. LLMs, however, can flexibly adopt different perspectives or"personas"that suggest different underlying systems of concept...
Austin C. Kozlowski, Avi I. Mintz, Madison Lee· 0 citations
LocUS (Localized Unembedding Steering), a method which grounds activation steering to the model's own output vocabulary subspace within the unembedding matrix, enforces a geometric constraint that restricts the steering transformation to a specific subspace and at the same time localizes its application to a sparse sub...
Irene Tallini, Lorenzo Basile, Valentino Maiorca et al.· 0 citations
Activation steering controls large language model behavior by adding a direction to hidden activations during inference. For steering to work well, that direction must be a pure signal for the target concept: any confound entangled with it, such as an incidental topic or writing style, is injected into the residual str...
Alexandros Xenos, Manos Plitsis, N. Foteinopoulou et al.· 0 citations
Steering large language models typically relies on linear, context-independent interventions in activation space, an assumption that recent work has challenged and that can induce an information bottleneck when a fixed representation must encode many behavioral distinctions. We introduce MetaSteer, a method that learns...
Overall, the results show that targeted feature quality depends jointly on the model signal and estimator, with detection and intervention capturing complementary properties.
Language-subspace interventions aim to improve multilingual reasoning by suppressing language-related components in mid-layer activations. Using MATH and MGSM across four open-weight LLMs, we ask three questions: do estimated language subspaces capture translation-associated variation? Does projecting them out remove l...
Shaanil Punglia, Dadhichi Telwadkar, V. Rathore et al.· 0 citations