Skip to content
Review Open access

Bridging modalities: a Survey and Taxonomy of Automated Multimodal Machine Learning (MMAutoML)

Jul 2026 · Artificial Intelligence Review · 0 citations

TL;DR

This survey reviews automated multimodal machine learning (MMAutoML), distinguishing core systems that automate both representation and fusion decisions from near-core systems, partial multimodal AutoML tools, and adjacent multimodal ML infrastructure.

Abstract

Automated machine learning (AutoML) reduces the cost of developing high-performing models by automating pipeline design, model selection, and hyperparameter optimization. As data sets increasingly combine heterogeneous sources (e.g., text, images, audio, and structured/tabular records), AutoML is extending to multimodal settings, where performance depends on representation learning and cross-modal fusion as well as model search. This survey reviews automated multimodal machine learning (MMAutoML), distinguishing core systems that automate both representation and fusion decisions from near-core systems, partial multimodal AutoML tools, and adjacent multimodal ML infrastructure. We organize multimodal learning around early, late, and hybrid fusion paradigms and discuss trade-offs in robustness, interpretability, and deployment. We then curate and compare representative open-source and commercial MMAutoML frameworks, summarize supported modalities, and characterize the ecosystem via time-evolution and similarity-based groupings. Finally, we overview applications in healthcare, autonomous systems, finance, and e-commerce, and highlight open challenges in modality alignment, missing or degraded inputs, efficiency and scalability, reproducibility, and governance (privacy, bias, and monitoring). We conclude with practical guidance and research directions toward reliable, end-to-end MMAutoML.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Multimodal Machine Learning for Data-Driven Materials Selection: A Review of Foundations, Advances, and Future Directions

This review aims to offer a conceptual framework and a solid reference for building intelligent multimodal material selection systems and presents a forward-looking research agenda covering self-supervised learning, knowledge-enhanced models, and interpretable human–AI collaboration.

Yuwei Zhang, C. Tan, Bei-Chen Wang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Automatic prompt engineering using multimodal large language models for the analysis of biological research images.

Two types of approaches are introduced: the Batch APE method, an efficient method for optimizing prompts for powerful black-box models, and a fine-tuning method with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and direct preference optimization (DPO) on a local vision-language model (VLM).

Keisuke Mizutani, Rintaro Yashiro, Kento Tokuyama · 0 citations
#large language models Review Open access Sep 2026

Multimodal medical diagnosis: a mini review of LLM–vision fusion models in low-resource healthcare settings

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and vision transformers have enabled multimodal systems that integrate clinical text with medical imaging for diagnostic decision-making. While these systems show promising results on benchmark datasets in well-resourced research settings, their applicability in low-resou...

Kahakashan Ashraf, Md.Hamid Hosen, N. Farah et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Volumetric Radiology AI in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models

This Review examines volumetric foundation models, language alignment and compression strategies, and agentic systems that extend MLLMs through planning, tools, memory, and workflow interaction, and introduces a Claim-Design-Validation framework to assess whether technical, workflow, and clinical claims are matched by...

Zan-Ting Ye, Shengyuan Liu, Xin Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Data-centric, robust, and explainable multimodal deep learning for clinical decision support: A systematic review.

Within this recent, self-selected slice of the field, technical robustness and explainability techniques are widely reported but rarely validated out-of-distribution or against clinical outcomes, and the underlying evidence is at high risk of bias.

Md. Mazharul Islam, Abrar Mohammed Tanzim Alam, Md Sadikur Rahman Rony et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Cedalion tutorial: a Python-based framework for comprehensive analysis of multimodal fNIRS and DOT from the lab to the everyday world

Cedalion is a Python-based open-source framework designed to unify advanced model-based and data-driven analysis of multimodal fNIRS and DOT data within a reproducible, extensible, and community-driven environment.

E. Middell, Laura B. Carlton, Shakiba Moradi et al. · 3 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.