2026· International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences· Vol 2, pp. 5-14· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is argued that AI is the new hyper-driven moment of commodification and cycle of global inequalities, which creates inconsistencies that break down established value and authority regimes, laying the ground for contestation and possible other trajectories.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is commonly portrayed as a technical innovation that inaugurates a new social epoch defined by efficiency, automation, and rational governance. This article advances a dialectical anthropological critique of such narratives by situating artificial intelligence within the historical dynamics of capitalism, colonial power, and struggles over labor and knowledge. Conceptualizing artificial intelligence as a social relation rather than a neutral technology, the article draws on Marxian political economy, Fanonian analyses of colonial domination, Gramscian theories of hegemony, Polanyian insights about market disembedding, and Comaroffian critiques of contemporary capitalism. It contends that AI, through labour, epistemology, or governance, is the new hyper-driven moment of commodification and cycle of global inequalities. Meanwhile, AI creates inconsistencies that break down established value and authority regimes, laying the ground for contestation and possible other trajectories. The paper outlines new directions for a critical anthropology of AI that foregrounds historical materiality and contradictions while committing the field to decolonial epistemologies and transformative praxis.
Michel Foucault's theorisation of power/knowledge fundamentally altered the vocabulary through which political theory understands authority, subjectivity, and governance. Rejecting the classical juridical model of power as a possession exercised downward by a sovereign, Foucault described power as a relational, product...
Prashant Kumar· Journal of Ecohumanism· 0 citations
It is argued that anthropology requires a new conceptual framework for understanding the contemporary social life of artificial intelligence (AI), and "the magic of AI" is proposed as an analytical concept that shifts attention from AI's technical capacities to the beliefs, uncertainties, and sociotechnical imaginaries...
M. Baas, Roanne van Voorst· Anthropological Theory· 2 citations
It is argued that contemporary artificial intelligence is best understood as a symptom and accelerator of modern nihilism rather than as a neutral instrument or proto-subject because it allows values to persist as calculable effects rather than contested commitments, thereby insulating human agents from the burden of j...
Against universalist narratives of technological neutrality, the article advocates for a situated ethics of AI and the recognition of algoagents as co-constructive actors in the production of imaginaries, subjectivities, and collective futures.
Edmondo Grassi· Journal of Emerging Perspect...· 0 citations
It is argued that the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act marks a paradigmatic shift from narratives of conquest to frameworks grounded in regulation, accountability, and coproduction.
Emanuele Frontoni, Simona Epasto· Journal of Emerging Perspect...· 0 citations
The emergence of algorithmic authority has profoundly reshaped contemporary understandings of truth, knowledge, and human flourishing. As computational systems increasingly assume epistemic authority once entrusted to philosophical, religious, and civic institutions, the church faces a renewed challenge of bearing fait...
J. D. Crowder· Religions· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.