Skip to content
Review

Efficient human-AI collaboration for code review

· 0 citations · 46 references

TL;DR

The results show that AI effectively lowers cognitive barriers by summarizing pull requests, detecting minor localized errors, and helping developers discover system-level problems, but AI tools must adopt a "do more with less" design philosophy where the design should focus on high-reliability features and not overload the users with information.

View source

Similar papers

#explainable ai Review Jul 2026

Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code Review

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate code review, but the reasoning behind their decisions remains hard to understand. Developers struggle to assess the validity of LLM-generated reviews, making it difficult to gauge how much trust to place in them. The role of Explainable AI (XAI)...

Zhenhan Gao, Marvin Muñoz Barón, Umm E. Habiba et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

From Human-Centric to Agentic Code Review: The Impact of Different Generations of Generative AI Technology on Review Quality

The results show that agent-involved collaboration patterns, especially reviews initiated by AI agents or involving multiple AI agents, are associated with faster review decisions under Gradual AI Adoption and Rapid AI Agent Adoption, but these efficiency gains do not translate into better review quality.

Suzhen Zhong, Shayan Noei, Bram Adams et al. · 2 citations
Review Jul 2026

The Case for Vibe Modeling: A Missing Step in AI-Based Trustworthy Software Development

A student survey study is presented that examines perceptions of LLM output understanding, validation effort, trust and the perceived usefulness of vibe modeling across several AI-assisted development scenarios to inform future studies for trustworthy and explainable AI-based software engineering via vibe modeling.

Shalini Chakraborty, M. Mittermaier, Judith Michael · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Structured Human-AI Teaming for UX Heuristic Evaluation with Human-in-the-Loop Supervision

A structured human-in-the-loop architecture that reframes heuristic evaluation as a problem of cognitive labor distribution is proposed and produced heuristic evaluation results that showed substantially greater alignment with human experts than those generated by the automated baseline.

Hyeonyeong Lee, Dusan Baek, Woojin Park · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Beyond automation: Generative AI as a strategic thought partner in educational advancement

It is concluded that GenAI, when implemented with clear guardrails and institutional integrity, has the potential to elevate advancement from an operational function to a strategic, mission-aligned partner in shaping the future of higher education.

Liz Hawkins · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.