Jul 2026· International Journal of Science and Research Archive· 0 citations
TL;DR
This article argues for an evidence-based approach that connects model behaviour, platform controls, user reliance, and auditable governance in enterprise reliability assessment in trust-aware LLM evaluation.
Abstract
Trust-aware evaluation is an emerging but rapidly consolidating research area for assessing the reliability of large language models in enterprise AI systems. Generative AI brings a new set of reliability challenges that extend beyond traditional accuracy metrics: An incorrect answer could affect key business decisions, customer interactions, knowledge management, security setups, or organizational accountability. This review summarizes peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 related to key aspects of trust-aware LLM evaluation, including hallucination and factuality assessment, LLM evaluation methods, trustworthy AI governance, and human trust calibration. As indicated in the literature, current evaluation practice is still fragmented, both in terms of the various technical metrics and in terms of the documentation instruments, as well as on the interpretation of the data and the user-centred design of the trust cues, organizational governance. The most critical gaps are weak alignment between benchmark outcomes and enterprise risk, limited post-deployment monitoring, insufficient context-specific trust calibration, and limited validation of evaluation frameworks in operational platforms. The article argues for an evidence-based approach that connects model behaviour, platform controls, user reliance, and auditable governance in enterprise reliability assessment.
The proposed assistant concept functions as a shared “knowledge navigator” over collaboration documents: it answers questions with traceable sources, surfaces knowledge gaps in the underlying corpus, guides onboarding and participation decisions, and supports agreement drafting and review by generating text while flagg...
Louise van der Peet, Nitesh Bharosa, M. Janssen· EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2026· 0 citations
It is suggested that trust in artificial intelligence based technology can form in a calibrated manner, coexisting with auditors' awareness of system limitations rather than diminishing their professional skepticism.
Kamal Amarullah, H. Ritchi, A. Mubarrok· Dinasti International Journa...· 0 citations
Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate code review, but the reasoning behind their decisions remains hard to understand. Developers struggle to assess the validity of LLM-generated reviews, making it difficult to gauge how much trust to place in them. The role of Explainable AI (XAI)...
Zhenhan Gao, Marvin Muñoz Barón, Umm E. Habiba et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This systematic literature review examines how stakeholder trust is conceptualized and measured in risk and science communication amid increasingly complex information environments shaped by misinformation and disinformation. Following PRISMA procedures, which provide a framework for conducting a systematic review with...
Matthew S. Weber, Chaeyeong Margo Lee, D. Kosson· Risk Analysis· 2 citations
A blockchain-based commit-reveal protocol using Autonomous Economic Agents on an Ethereum-compatible ledger creates a tamper-evident audit trail that separates blind evaluation from post-hoc claims and reduces the verification burden on independent researchers and leaderboard operators.
The Dependency Confidence Index is presented, a composite formative index that combines nine empirically weighted trust factors into a single normalized composite score for dependency selection, and its publicly available implementation provides a foundation for open source software trustworthiness research and practic...
C. Albrecht, S. Reitmann· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.