2026· International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation· pp. 419-430· 0 citations· 39 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work presents J-ClinicalBench, a publicly available benchmark designed to reflect realistic Japanese clinical tasks, and evaluates state-of-the-art proprietary and Japanese open-source LLMs, providing the first assessment of their utility in practical clinical scenarios.
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated the NLP applications in the medical and clinical domains. However, evaluations remain limited for non-English languages, such as Japanese, where clinical corpora are particularly scarce. To address this gap, we present J-ClinicalBench , a publicly available benchmark designed to reflect realistic Japanese clinical tasks. We first created 227 expert-authored clinical documents and newly constructed five datasets for core clinical tasks. Building on these datasets, J-ClinicalBench comprises nine clinical tasks spanning clinical language reasoning, generation, and understanding. We establish baseline performance on J-ClinicalBench by evaluating state-of-the-art proprietary and Japanese open-source LLMs, providing the first assessment of their utility in practical clinical scenarios. By releasing this benchmark, we aim to foster the development and evaluation of clinically applicable LLMs in Japanese healthcare, bridging the current gap between clinical NLP research and clinical practice. J-ClinicalBench and our evaluation are available at https://github.com/seiji-shimizu/J-ClinicalBench-release
A comprehensive survey of various benchmark datasets used in medical LLM tasks, focusing on various aspects of medical knowledge such as electronic health records, doctor–patient dialogues, medical question answering, and medical image captioning, is presented.
L. K. Yan, Qian Niu, Ming Li et al.· Medicine Advances· 34 citations· ⚡1
MMTClinic is presented, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning and question-answering tasks involving clinical time-series and reveals notable differences in model performance across tasks, languages, and modalities, highlighting current limitations in clinical reasoning capa...
Sourav Malakar, Harshit Nigam, Akash Ghosh et al.· 0 citations
This article aims to provide a pragmatic basis for designing and executing rigorous evaluations of healthcare LLMs by describing underlying concepts and potential pitfalls, while emphasizing the importance of aligning evaluation methods with the research question.
S. E. McKinney, P. Vu, S. Justice et al.· 0 citations
Background Most large language models (LLMs) have achieved passing scores on medical licensing examinations. However, most evaluations focus on single-question accuracy, overlooking performance on multistep patient management scenarios, such as making a diagnosis followed by a treatment plan. It is unclear if LLMs can...
Jia-Xue Cha, Yan Zhao, Hui Zong· JMIR Medical Education· 0 citations
Most clinical benchmarks evaluate language models (LMs) on diagnosis using complete case descriptions. In clinical practice, however, patients present information in different ways, and clinicians must obtain relevant history and determine which examinations are needed before reaching a diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy a...
Interdisciplinary clinical boards (ICB) on chronic inflammatory diseases discuss complicated and multidisciplinary cases with inflammatory conditions among experts in their discipline. Medically specialized large language models (LLMs) are finding increasingly widespread use among physicians to answer clinical question...
M. Ronicke, L. Sollfrank, Ioannis Sagonas et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.