Skip to content
Preprint

Counterfactual Analysis via Large Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 24 references
Computer Science Economics

TL;DR

This paper investigates the application of large language models (LLMs), specifically the GPT-3.5 model, for counterfactual analysis in the online lending context, and utilizes GPT to generate counterfactual ROIs under a set of alternative interest rates.

Abstract

Counterfactual analysis aims to predict potential outcomes under hypothetical scenarios, offering valuable insights for decision-making. This paper investigates the application of large language models (LLMs), specifically the GPT-3.5 model, for counterfactual analysis. We focus on the online lending context, where the counterfactual return on investment (ROI) is crucial for evaluating different interest rate schemes. We begin by assessing the predictive performance of GPT and comparing it with advanced machine learning algorithms. The results show that prompt engineering can significantly enhance GPT's predictions, with the R-squared increasing from 1.97% to 2.84%, closely approaching the 3.48% achieved by gradient-boosted regression. Subsequently, we utilize GPT to generate counterfactual ROIs under a set of alternative interest rates. GPT exhibits logical coherence and causal reasoning in its responses. The findings underscore the potential of LLMs as effective tools for counterfactual analysis in online lending, suggesting broader applications for LLMs in various predictive and decision-making contexts.

View source

Similar papers

Open access 2026

From Prediction to Decision: A Counterfactual Machine Reasoning Framework for ESG Analysis

A Machine Reasoning (MR) framework that transforms ESG evaluation into a structured decision-making process that decomposes ESG evidence into three independent streams: environmental efficiency, financial comparative position, and causal profit-margin effects estimated via DoWhy, and integrates them through five condit...

Nizam Tanzina, Kyupil Yeon · 0 citations
Jul 2026

CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark

CEL (Counterfactual Explanations Library), a unified library and benchmark for counterfactual explanations designed to support consistent implementation and evaluation, is introduced, believed to be the first comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates recent counterfactual explanation methods within a unifie...

Oleksii Furman, Lukasz Lenkiewicz, Marcel Musialek et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

AI Trading: Evaluating Large Language Models for Technical Market Analysis

It is concluded that while LLMs hold genuine promise within AI trading systems, robust deployment requires careful task decomposition, rigorous backtesting protocols, and domain-aware fine-tuning strategies.

Geofrey Ntale · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Behavioural Signatures of Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making in Large Language Models

It is suggested that LLMs differ not only in baseline risk disposition, but also in the risk signals they respond to and the flexibility with which they adjust, providing a behavioural basis for auditing risk-sensitive decision-making in interactive settings.

Xuan-Kun Rong, Wenke Huang, Bo Du et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

FinRiskAtlas: Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Large Language Models for Financial Risk Review

FinRiskAtlas is introduced, a Chinese-language benchmark that evaluates financial LLMs along two complementary dimensions: operation execution under fixed evidence states and evidence-state control under evolving review conditions, and shows that broad financial capability scores do not fully capture where models are r...

Su-Yang Zhong, Jingzhe Zhu, Qi Xu et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Would this change your answer? Evaluating Explanations of LLM Behavior In The Wild with Counterfactual Experiments

This work introduces CHIVE (Counterfactual Hypothesis Investigation Via Edits), a novel agentic pipeline that identifies unexpected model behaviors in the wild and investigates them with counterfactual prompt edits, enabling us to evaluate and improve methods for explaining LLM behaviors.

Adam Karvonen, Euan Ong, Subhash Kantamneni et al. · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.