Skip to content
Open access

Recursive mentalizing and public salience in the perception of common knowledge

Aug 2026 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · Vol 123 · 0 citations · 35 references
Medicine

Abstract

Significance Coordinating actions requires common knowledge: not just knowing something, but knowing that others know it, and so on. This seems impossible for finite minds, yet humans coordinate on scales from couples to countries. We propose people achieve coordination by tracking a few layers of who knows what who else knows and by treating publicly witnessed events as licensing implicit common knowledge. In two studies, participants inferred that public events justified arbitrarily deep mutual understanding, though they sometimes overextended or confused knowledge states. This mix of valid and faulty reasoning helps explain how humans achieve large-scale coordination while also being prone to missteps, from everyday faux pas to collective dilemmas such as bubbles, bank runs, panic buying, and strategic miscalculations.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Hey, guess what: CUES lead to inferences about typicality

Throughout life, we accumulate knowledge of how typical certain events are. We use this knowledge in daily conversation, often interpreting meaning beyond what has been said explicitly. In this work, we take steps to better understand this meaning recovery, investigating both atypicality and typicality inferences. Firs...

Alison Chi, Sanghyeok Choi, Hannah Rohde et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

From Belief Inference to Task Action: A Multi-Level Evaluation of Theory of Mind on Verifiable Tasks

Effective collaboration requires language models to understand what others know and believe, and to act accordingly. Models that assume others share their information may omit necessary communication and undermine coordination. Many theory-of-mind (ToM) benchmarks assess mental-state inference through story questions,...

Zhen-Shuai Yin, Yong-Xin Guo, Ming-Da Zhang et al. · 0 citations

Artificial Intelligence and the Brave New World in Finance

Preparing for the asymmetric understanding scenario calls for segmented markets that preserve a human fallback, simpler and more robust central bank rules, and less strategic ambiguity.

M. Brunnermeier, Sylvain Chassang, Martin Chorzempa et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

The Epistemic Authorization Filter: Windows, Gates, and Costs of Misinformation

We all know someone who will not change their mind, no matter what evidence you show them. This article explains why—and why the problem is structural, not personal. Our minds filter information through a sequence of checkpoints that determines what we accept as true, and when. Once misinformation passes through thos...

Syed Umer Ahmad Qadri · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Combatting Meta-Ignorance in Science Through Dialogs with Diverse Experts

In their provocative paper, Shiffrin, Stigler, and Keil (SSK) declare that scientists have illusions of understanding the phenomena they study “more deeply” than they really do. In this comment I grant their claim a degree of truth and focus on the nature of illusions of understanding. These are a form of meta-ignoranc...

M. Smithson · 0 citations
Book Sep 2026

Explaining Knowledge

The book presents a novel, abductivist theory of knowledge and argues for it over its two main rivals: safety theory and causal explanationism. According to abductivism, a belief constitutes knowledge when, given the way it is formed or maintained, the best explanation of its being true rather than false lies in the...

Sven Bernecker · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.