Jul 2026· International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis· 0 citations
TL;DR
This review examines the evolution of physical modelling from classical first-principles approaches to contemporary data-driven and physics-informed learning frameworks, with a central focus on Physics-Informed Neural Networks and related hybrid methods that integrate governing laws into learning algorithms to improve prediction, generalization, and physical plausibility.
Abstract
This review examines the evolution of physical modelling from classical first-principles approaches to contemporary data-driven and physics-informed learning frameworks. It begins with the historical foundations of scientific modelling, including classical mechanics, field equations, computational simulation, and statistical mechanics, and shows how these traditions established differential equations and numerical methods as core tools in science and engineering. The review then discusses the rise of data-driven modelling, covering statistical learning, machine learning, deep learning, and Gaussian processes, with attention to their strengths in handling complex nonlinear systems and their limitations in interpretability, data requirements, and physical consistency. A central focus is placed on Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and related hybrid methods that integrate governing laws into learning algorithms to improve prediction, generalization, and physical plausibility. Applications across fluid dynamics, structural engineering, climate science, biomedicine, materials discovery, and energy systems are highlighted. Finally, the review identifies key challenges related to scalability, uncertainty quantification, robustness, and benchmarking, and outlines future directions such as active learning, operator learning, and scientific foundation models.
The results demonstrate that PINN achieves more accurate and stable full-field vibration reconstructions than conventional PINNs, particularly under conditions involving high-frequency modes, and highlights the potential of hybrid data-physics neural frameworks as an efficient and reliable approach for solving complex...
Hai-Long Liu, S. Hedayatrasa, Yunpeng Zhu et al.· e-Journal of Nondestructive...· 0 citations
This review examines neural operator architectures for learning solution operators of parametric partial differential equations (PDEs), with an emphasis on conceptual clarity and practical implementation, and positioning neural operators within broader scientific-computing workflows and by identifying directions for re...
A comprehensive analysis of PINNs and their variations for fluid dynamics in the human biological system will be presented, indicating that PINN‐based models are more accurate in predicting the major hemodynamic parameters, including velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress (WSS).
N. R, Amutha S, D. R et al.· WIREs Data Mining and Knowle...· 0 citations
The results demonstrate that the mPINN architecture functions as a reliable, physics-constrained ML framework capable of delivering high-fidelity trajectory predictions for complex multi-body molecular systems.
T. Muther, Vuong Van Pham, A. K. Dahaghi· Machine Learning: Science an...· 0 citations
Identifying stochastic dynamical systems from observational data remains a major challenge in applied mathematics and engineering, particularly when complex systems are influenced by random perturbations and incomplete empirical information. This comprehensive review aims to examine state-of-the-art data-driven methods...
Rishav Jha, Kameshwar Sahani, S. K. Sahani et al.· African Multidisciplinary Jo...· 0 citations
This work develops a theoretical framework for analyzing the generalization error of PINNs under model misspecification, establishing both an architecture‐independent error bound and an explicit bound for a specific PINN architecture.
Guoquan Wu, Yuyang Jiang, Yao Shi et al.· AIChE Journal· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.