Skip to content
Open access

Automating Content Analysis With Multiple LLM Agents: Impacts of Agent Attributes and Human–AI Collaboration

Jul 2026 · Social science computer review · 0 citations · 48 references

TL;DR

Examination of the impact of agent diversity, agent open-mindedness, and human–AI collaboration (HAIC) in a multi-LLM-agent system for automated content analysis demonstrates reliable and accurate measurement of four communication variables across three datasets, with improved performance following agent discussion.

Abstract

Emerging research in computational social science has applied LLMs to automate content analysis, often by prompting a single model to act as a human coder. While a single LLM may suffice for a few manifest variables, it still falls short on diverse latent constructs. And the impact of LLM agent attributes on measurement outcomes remains unclear, limiting their validity for communication research. Drawing upon the literature on interacting agents and communication, this study examines the impact of agent diversity, agent open-mindedness, and human–AI collaboration (HAIC) in a multi-LLM-agent system for automated content analysis. The results demonstrate reliable and accurate measurement of four communication variables across three datasets, with improved performance following agent discussion. Additionally, agent open-mindedness, but not agent diversity, significantly affects measurement outcomes. These results highlight the potential of multi-LLM-agent systems for automated content analysis and suggest the importance of considering agent attributes and values in system design.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Book Open access Sep 2026

Identifying Interaction Dimensions and their Relation to Agent Behavior in Human-AI Teams

This work provides a new framework for AI agent designers to understand user behavior and guidelines for better supporting it, and observed that while users self-report goal prioritization independently of agent behavior, in-game logs reveal that non-collaborative goals are prioritized significantly more often with AI...

Inês Lobo, Janin Koch, Jennifer Renoux et al. · 0 citations
2025

Collaborative Reasoner: Self-Improving Social Agents with Synthetic Conversations

This work presents Collaborative Reasoner, a framework to evaluate and improve the collaborative reasoning abilities of language models, and proposes a self-play method to generate synthetic multi-turn preference data and further train the language models to be better collaborators.

Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li et al. · 7 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Agent‐Related Perceptions of Automated Versus Human Agents and the Role of Task‐Related Risk: A Meta‐Analysis

Findings challenge two prevailing assumptions in the services marketing literature: that customers favor humans over AAs simply because they are not humanlike and that risk generally discourages AA usage.

Sandra Miederer, Katja Gelbrich, H. Roschk et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Principal Trait Analysis: Towards Deriving"Skills"in Human-AI Collaboration

An automated, data-driven approach to uncover patterns, which the authors term traits, of effective human-AI interaction that are aligned with task outcomes is explored and Principal Trait Analysis is proposed, a Principal Component Analysis-inspired algorithm for deriving common traits from patterns in LLM conversatio...

Hunter McNichols, Kai Du, Andrew S. Lan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

AgentPanel: Toward a New Paradigm for Human--AI Collaboration in Exploring Scientific Questions

This work presents AgentPanel, a multi-agent forum for human--AI collaboration in scientific exploration, a multi-agent forum for human--AI collaboration in scientific exploration that outperforms a centralized multi-agent debate baseline and shows that users value AgentPanel for perspective diversity and exploration s...

Zhi-Yao Cui, Qianyi Wang, Hao Yan et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.