The findings support a model of shared genetic liability across diverse substance use behaviors, mediated by specific gene expression patterns in the mesolimbic dopamine system and frontal cortex, and provides critical insights into the tissue-specific neurobiological pathways underlying addiction vulnerability.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Substance use behaviors share a complex, overlapping polygenic architecture, yet translating genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings into actionable biological mechanisms remains challenging. This study aimed to characterize the genetic architecture of five substance use traits (alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence, nicotine use, illicit drug use, and behavioral disinhibition) and identify shared and distinct gene expression signatures within the neural circuits governing addiction. Methods: We reanalyzed 7188 individuals from the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research (MCTFR) cohort utilizing longitudinal composite phenotypes spanning five substance-use domains and general behavioral disinhibition. Post-QC, 6874 individuals were retained for downstream analysis. Following genomic imputation and linear mixed model GWAS (GEMMA), we utilized the SNipar framework to partition polygenic risk scores (PRS) into direct and indirect genetic effects, investigating intergenerational shifts in genetic penetrance and effects of assortative mating. Finally, we integrated our summary statistics with brain tissue reference panels to perform a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) modeling genetically regulated gene expression within neural circuits relevant to addiction. Results: Partitioning of polygenic risk revealed that while surface-level parental DNA correlations were modest (r = 0.08), underlying latent genetic correlations approached unity (Rδ ≈ 0.99), indicating that addiction risk clustering in families is driven by intense assortive mating and concentrated biological inheritance. Multi-phenotype TWAS identified several significant gene–phenotype associations—notably ADAM32 and SLC9A3, which demonstrated pleiotropic effects across multiple substance use categories. Crucially, these significant TWAS signals were enriched in striatal structures (caudate, putamen, substantia nigra) and frontal cortical regions. Conclusions: Our findings support a model of shared genetic liability across diverse substance use behaviors, mediated by specific gene expression patterns in the mesolimbic dopamine system and frontal cortex. By integrating multi-phenotype GWAS and TWAS, this study highlights pleiotropic candidate genes and provides critical insights into the tissue-specific neurobiological pathways underlying addiction vulnerability.
Findings suggest that part of SCZ liability reflects genetic susceptibility to SUDs with potential implications for patient stratification and clinical management.
S. Aranda, D. Koller, S. Papiol et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
This review summarizes the current evidence on the genetic basis of TUD and discusses the limitations of early candidate-gene studies and the paradigm shift introduced by large GWAS and meta-analyses, and polygenic risk scores, which indicate that tobacco use and nicotine dependence have a highly polygenic and pleiotro...
These findings provide a hypothesis-generating reframing of the traditional comorbidity model, suggesting that divergent molecular programs may converge on shared pathways and offer a preliminary foundation for exploring therapeutic strategies at the mood–metabolism interface.
Xing-Pei Li, Chunling Chen, Huibin Li et al.· Frontiers in Genetics· 0 citations
This study identifies DDX6 as a novel OUD risk locus, replicates associations with OPRM1 and FURIN, and highlights biologically plausible ancestry-specific signals in AFR and AMR populations.
Shaopeng Gu, D. Petrovitch, O. T. Hall et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
By dissecting the genetic liability to SUD and SU and investigating their relationship with BIP, this work finds a genetic signature correlated with substance dependence but not substance use more broadly.
L. Ystaas, P. Parekh, N. Parker et al.· Biological Psychiatry· 0 citations
Although several associations reached nominal significance, none remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons and the precision of the estimates was constrained by the available imaging GWAS sample size, uncertainty in SNP-heritability estimates, and the large number of regional comparisons.
Mengman Wei, Qian Peng· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.