Skip to content
Review Open access

Large Language Models in Adverse Drug Reaction Detection and Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Aug 2026 · Diagnostics · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 76 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Current evidence supports supervised, task-specific applications of LLMs for extraction, triage, retrieval, and documentation rather than autonomous pharmacovigilance decision-making, highlighting their potential for precision medicine and big data-enabled safety monitoring.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pharmacovigilance workflows rely heavily on unstructured text across diverse sources. Here, we systematically reviewed how large language models (LLMs) are being explored as support tools for adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection, extraction, triage, and documentation, highlighting their potential for precision medicine and big data-enabled safety monitoring. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2022 and March 2026. Ultimately, 83 empirical studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted to address methodological heterogeneity across these studies. Results: LLM applications were concentrated in constrained information-extraction and classification tasks, including signal evaluation, clinical-note extraction, social media surveillance, and literature screening. Quantitative performance varied substantially by system design: error-correction prompting yielded an F1-score of 0.921 for ADR named entity recognition, whereas retrieval-augmented generation improved data-retrieval accuracy from 8.3% to 78.3%. Most studies were retrospective, benchmark-based, or proof-of-concept evaluations. Across 581 paired pre-consensus domain judgements, observed inter-rater agreement was 90.4% and Cohen’s κ was 0.837 (95% CI 0.772–0.895). Hallucination, low specificity, prompt sensitivity, narrow datasets, and weak external validation remained common limitations. Conclusions: Current evidence supports supervised, task-specific applications of LLMs for extraction, triage, retrieval, and documentation rather than autonomous pharmacovigilance decision-making. Prospective evaluation, external validation, transparent reporting, and accountable human oversight are required before high-stakes clinical or regulatory deployment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Performance of large language models in data extraction for evidence synthesis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE Data extraction is among the most resource-intensive and error-prone stages of systematic review production. Large language models (LLMs) offer potential for automating or semi-automating this process, yet their performance characteristics remain incompletely characterised. This systematic review aimed to com...

Ravi Shankar, Amaevia Lim, Xu Qian · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Comment on: “A comprehensive landscape of AI applications in broad-spectrum drug interaction prediction: a systematic review” (Marzouk et al., 2025)

Marzouk et al. reviewed 147 studies on artificial intelligence (AI) applications for predicting drug–drug, drug–disease, and drug–nutrient interactions, providing a broad overview of current machine learning and deep-learning approaches. However, several methodological and conceptual limitations reduce the reproducibil...

Alireza Kargar, Mohammad Ali Zamani, Ghader Mohammadnezhad · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction: Scoping Review of Bias and Clinical Utility Documentation in 2019-2024

Abstract Background A growing body of literature leverages large language models (LLMs) to make mental health predictions. However, these models are prone to bias, and studies to validate their clinical utility are lacking. Objective This scoping review aims to uncover bias and clinical utility limitations stemming fro...

Clémentine Bleuze, Karen Fort, Vincent P. Martin et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

AI-Powered Prescription Error Detection Using Large Language Models (LLMs): A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

It is concluded that LLM-based decision-support tools hold substantial promise as complementary — rather than autonomous — decision-support systems capable of transforming medication safety and pharmacy practice.

K. K. Kumar, Koyya Gowtham Reddy, K. Reddy · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Large Language Models as Clinical Support Tools in Drug Information Services: Performance Comparison With Pharmacists

LLMs show potential as tools for preliminary drug information retrieval and rapid responses generation in drug information services, however, variable concordance and persistent limitations in citation credibility indicate the need for continued pharmacist oversight.

Nuntapong Boonrit, Najwa Bin-Useng, Aphichaya Sirijariyawat et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Review Open access Aug 2026

Toward Automating the Selection of Articles Reporting EQ-5D Data for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Large Language Models: Algorithm Development and Evaluation Study

The models reproduced human screening tendencies despite the small dataset size, demonstrating the technical feasibility of LLM-assisted article selection and providing the first demonstration of LLM-assisted identification of EQ-5D data in biomedical literature.

Gábor Kertész, J. Czere, Z. Zrubka et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.