2026· International Conference on Data Technologies and Applications· pp. 621-628· 0 citations· 64 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This position paper argues that each original challenge for LLM-based Text-to-SQL has given rise to a new dimension, and synthesizes these concerns and outlines a research agenda along three horizons, arguing for trustworthiness, interactivity, and economic sustainability as first-class concerns.
Abstract
: Building on a prior analysis that identified five key challenges for LLM-based Text-to-SQL (response time, scalability, hallucinations, dataset representativeness, and knowledge acquisition), this position paper argues that each original challenge has given rise to a new dimension: response-time and scalability pressures produced agentic approaches; the pursuit of accuracy on complex queries led to reasoning models; hallucination research exposed the deeper trustworthiness problem, including security; static-benchmark limitations motivated conversational evaluation; and scalability became an economic question, surfacing the open versus proprietary tension. The field has transformed: agentic architectures now surpass 81% execution accuracy on the BIRD test set, yet state-of-the-art systems remain no higher than 17% end-to-end success on multi-turn interactive benchmarks, and backdoor attacks succeed with less than 1% poisoned training data. We synthesize these concerns and outline a research agenda along three horizons, arguing for trustworthiness, interactivity, and economic sustainability as first-class concerns.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become foundational to next-generation Intelligent Information Systems, the bridge between natural language interfaces and structured database systems remains a critical bottleneck. While Text-to-SQL generation enables cooperative support for complex query formulation, ensuring the rel...
M. Tritto, G. Farano, Dario Di Palma et al.· Journal of Intelligence and...· 2 citations
A Python harness mirroring the autonomy axis is released so that future methods can be added directly to the leaderboard, and four patterns emerge: Spider gains transfer unevenly to BIRD and Spider~2.0; autonomy buys robustness at non-trivial cost; reasoning internalization sits between answer-only decoding and externa...
Changruo Zhao, Zujun Peng, Yu Tian et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
A unified taxonomy of 8 categories covering ambiguous and unanswerable questions is addressed, a multi-agent generation pipeline with a two-stage process (NLQ generation followed by SQL grounding) and an explicit Category Conformance validation stage are addressed.
Giovanni Sullutrone, Luca Sala, Sania Aftar et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
: Large language models are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical domains, yet remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that circumvent safety alignments. This systematic review synthesizes empirical jailbreak research published between 2024 and 2025, using a PRISMA-guided search protocol, followed by BERTopic-b...
Meda Račaitytė, Hélder Bastos, R. Ribeiro et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
The first Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Competition is organized, which frames contamination detection as a white-box membership inference task on source code and provides participants with curated datasets, target models, baseline attacks, and a final evaluation on a held-out model and dataset.
J. Katzy, Ali Al-Kaswan, R. Popescu et al.· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 1 citation· ⚡1
A large-scale benchmark with 60\sim 90× more queries than prior work, built on 3× more databases, an automated pipeline that can execute existing methods without manual intervention, and multi-dimensional, fine-grained evaluation metrics for comprehensive assessment.
Bo Li, Chenzhan Wang, Long-Kang Lin et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.