This work introduces Lipschitz-constrained variants of object detection architectures as robust-by-design alternatives to standard detectors and suggests that architectural Lipschitz control is a practical and attack-agnostic direction for improving the robustness of object detectors.
Abstract
Object detectors have many applications in safety-critical systems, but they are known to be sensitive to worst-case perturbations such as adversarial attacks, which limits their applicability in real-world scenarios. Compared with classification, adversarial robustness for object detection has received less attention, and existing methods are often tied to adversarial training, whose performance may not transfer across attacks, perturbation budgets, or architectures. In this work, we introduce Lipschitz-constrained variants of object detection architectures as robust-by-design alternatives to standard detectors. We validate this approach with LipSSD, a Lipschitz-constrained Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), and provide a comprehensive study of its adversarial robustness using multiple white-box adversarial attacks and datasets. We first analyze the accuracyrobustness trade-off induced by Lipschitz constraints and show that it can be controlled through a single training hyperparameter. We then demonstrate that Lipschitzconstrained detectors are complementary to adversarial training: under the same training setup on the Pascal VOC dataset, adversarially trained LipSSD improves mAP@50 on unseen attacks by up to 15 points over classical adversarially trained SSD. Finally, we use more specific safety-critical datasets such as LARD and KITTI, and show that Lipschitz-constrained detectors can improve robustness while largely preserving clean performance. These results suggest that architectural Lipschitz control is a practical and attack-agnostic direction for improving the robustness of object detectors.
AdROD outperforms five baseline defenses and exhibits superior generalizability compared with the evaluated adversarial-training baselines, while maintaining real-time performance for safely stopping the vehicle at a stop sign instrumented with adversarial patches.
Yuting Wu, Dongfang Guo, Xiangzhong Luo et al.· 0 citations
InsCAT is proposed, an instance-level contrastive adversarial training framework that prevents detectors from using adversarial texture as an independent decision cue, and consistent gains across separately trained detectors demonstrate applicability across architectures with direct inference.
Yuanhao Huang, Yi-Long Ren, Jin-Lei Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Through ALLUDE's end-to-end differentiable rendering, adversarial attacks can be optimized against shifting real-world deployment conditions, and can be optimized against shifting real-world deployment conditions.
Mansi Phute, Alexander D. Greenhalgh, Matthew Hull et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work proposes an efficient and effective adversarial attack detection scheme leveraging the multi-task perception within a complex vision system, and develops a consistency score metric to measure the inconsistency between vision tasks.
Cong Chen, J. Monteuuis, Jonathan Petit· 0 citations
A new method is proposed, the"Binary Iterative Method"(BinIM), which uses a divide-and-conquer paradigm to optimise parameters and hyper-parameters for the generation of non-targeted attacks.
Naman Goyal, Milan J Chaudhari· arXiv.org· 0 citations
LatentAdv, an adversarial camouflage generation framework that integrates ControlNet-based reference style generation and variational autoencoder (VAE) latent space optimization, is proposed, which provides a feasible solution for balancing attack performance and visual naturalness in adversarial object detection.
Kang-Hua Liu, Yun-Peng Feng, Le Yu et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.