Skip to content
Review Open access

Future-use consent and human virome research: ethical challenges

Jul 2026 · Journal of Virology · Vol 100 · 0 citations · 37 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Emerging interpretive frameworks for biospecimens, the unforeseen sensitivity of viral findings, unanticipated downstream uses of samples, and unresolved questions regarding the return of results call for updated governance capable of sustaining the ethical legitimacy of clinical research in rapidly evolving scientific landscapes.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Future-use consent frameworks enable broad research on biospecimens and now extend to human virome studies. However, virome research challenges the core assumptions underlying these consent models. We examine four dimensions of concern: evolving interpretive frameworks for biospecimens, the unforeseen sensitivity of viral findings, unanticipated downstream uses of samples, and unresolved questions regarding the return of results. These features call for updated governance capable of sustaining the ethical legitimacy of clinical research in rapidly evolving scientific landscapes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Ethical frameworks and community engagement in HIV cure-related research at the end of life: looking back, moving forward

Purpose of review HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life has created a rare opportunity to study viral persistence in tissues that cannot be safely or repeatedly sampled during life. This review examines ethical frameworks and community engagement approaches in this field from 2016 to 2026, with attention to pote...

Ali Ahmed, Whitney Tran, S. Ndukwe et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

When does broad consent expire? A temporal validity framework for biobank samples in induced pluripotent stem cell research

Elapsed time is one input, alongside technological novelty and the persistence of trust infrastructure such as CAB continuity and community reporting, into a graded governance decision that gives biobanks and research ethics committees a reproducible way to decide when broad consent for a sample collection still holds,...

P. Ikhane, S. Adebamowo, Temilola Yusuf et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

The oriGen case and Mexico's regulatory blind spots in genomic biobanking.

The oriGen project represents a pioneering but institutionally anchored response to Mexico's regulatory gap. Yet, viewed through the lens of contemporary scholarship, its model-private university ownership, broad individual consent, and external sequencing partnerships-stands in tension with emerging global norms for e...

Guillermo Aquino-Jarquín · 1 citation
Open access 2026

Biotechnology’s Ethical and Reproducibility Crisis: Beyond the Hype

Modern biotechnology promises to cure diseases, feed the world, and address major ecological challenges. Yet a critical examination reveals that the field also faces significant ethical, reproducibility, and governance challenges that deserve rigorous scrutiny. Drawing on documented cases from gene therapy pricing cont...

Qi Gao · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Patient and IRB perspectives on biobank consent models: implications for international policy from Taiwan.

BACKGROUND Biobank consent models are contested globally. The EU's GDPR Article 89, the US revised Common Rule (2018), and international guidelines offer divergent approaches to balancing participant autonomy and research efficiency. Despite ongoing policy debate, empirical evidence comparing research ethics oversight...

Chi-Hung Huang, Chih-Shung Wong, Henry Hsin-Chung Lee et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.