Skip to content

The Price of Genetic Knowledge: Implications of DNA and Pharmacogenetic Testing on Insurance Access and Data Use.

Jul 2026 · Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives · Vol 71 4, pp. 244-252 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Applying a bioethics framework of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, nonmaleficence, and justice allows these issues to be examined, and current protections to be evaluated for the purpose of instituting change.

Abstract

SUMMARY Genetic testing, including pharmacogenetic testing, is transforming personalized healthcare by improving risk assessment and treatment decisions. However, these advancements raise ethical, practical, and legal concerns for data privacy and security, as test results are often stored in EHRs. Additional concerns include the use of genetic data in underwriting for policies not covered under the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, including life, disability, and long-term care insurance.These issues affect patients, consumers, and the broader healthcare system by increasing costs when patients delay testing or treatment out of fear of discrimination. They also strain public health programs when individuals are denied coverage because of genetic risks, leading to a "genetic underclass," in which people with certain genetic predispositions are marginalized from the insurance market. Applying a bioethics framework of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice allows these issues to be examined, and current protections to be evaluated for the purpose of instituting change.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Powerful Perceptions of Genetic Information.

AbstractResearchers who focus on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genetics have tried to anticipate and mitigate the unique risks of genetic testing. To that end, ELSI scholars have focused on the unique predictive power and the subtle ambiguities of genetic test results. Much of this work has assu...

K. P. Callahan, Rebecca Mueller, M. Hess et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Knowledge and misconceptions of the French population regarding medical genetics: a survey of 3,000 respondents

Critical gaps in public knowledge in genetics are highlighted, emphasizing the need for improved genetic education, including incorporating genetics into school curricula and launching targeted awareness campaigns to promote informed decision-making.

S. Mercier, F. Petit, M. Misrahi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Medicolegal and ethical concerns in genetic tests communication

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the state of the art on the communication of genetic test results in both clinical and judicial practice in Europe, with a specific focus on Italy.

P. Di Lorenzo, M. Marisei, Marco Macculi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits.

Public views on polygenic embryo testing are examined, suggesting variability in choices across specific traits and conditions, rather than a uniform distinction between medical conditions and non-medical traits.

Edmond Awad, Clara Colombatto, J. Demaree-Cotton et al. · 0 citations
2026

Cost-utility analysis of implementing early genetic screening programs for hereditary cancer (e.g., BRCA mutations) in the compulsory medical insurance system

It was found that preventing breast and ovarian cancer or detecting it at early, localized stages provides significant long-term savings for the compulsory health insurance system by reducing treatment costs for disseminated forms of the disease and leads to a significant increase in QALYs saved.

G. Arsakhanova, Diana Rustamovna Akaeva, Selima Visayevna Sultaeva · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.