Rethinking AI Cloud Infrastructure for Agentic Serving Systems with the Aries Experimentation Framework

A Self-Calibrating Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Edge Resource Allocation

Experimental results show that the proposed self-calibrating agentic framework successfully profiles the zero-knowledge workloads, achieving a higher accuracy than baseline LLM agents and establishing a robust foundation for deploying autonomous AI in decentralized infrastructures.

A Case for Simulation-Driven Resilience in Agentic Data Systems

From LLM Inference to Agentic Workloads: Characterization and Implications for Serving Systems

Agentic applications are shifting AI serving from isolated model inference to long-running workloads in which LLMs coordinate tools, environments, and persistent state. However, the system behavior of these workloads---where latency, cost, and bottlenecks arise---remains poorly characterized, leaving serving systems to rely on assumptions built for conventional inference. We present AgentSysBench, a benchmark suite and measurement toolkit with ten representative agentic applications and unified systems-level instrumentation. Across controlled deployments and production traces, we identify six properties that distinguish agentic workloads from conventional LLM serving: (1) execution is heavyweight and stateful, with non-LLM components dominating latency in 5 of 10 applications and sandbox working-set memory peaking at 28 GB per session; (2) applications compose components with heterogeneous resource affinity---GPU-bound inference, memory-bound retrieval, CPU-bound sandboxes---whose task latencies diverge by up to 32x; (3) bottlenecks shift across requests, models, and deployments; (4) production sessions hold state idle for minutes to hours between active steps; (5) a control-plane tax---auxiliary LLM calls and context overhead from tool schemas and observations---crowds out productive compute and context; and (6) production traces from three applications reveal heavy cross-request redundancy in search queries and web fetches, exposing a large caching opportunity. Four design explorations demonstrate that these findings are actionable: task-aware serving reduces latency by 29--40%, communication-aware placement by up to 4.5x, state offloading reduces memory usage by 4.6x, and tool-result caching removes 35.2% of redundant search calls and saves 19.3% of aggregate search latency.

Simthesizer: An Agent-Driven Simulation Framework for LLM Serving Systems

System-level simulation is an essential tool for exploring the rapidly expanding design space of LLM serving systems, where real deployments remain costly and often infeasible. However, modern LLM serving now evolves faster than human-driven simulator development can track, and emerging workloads and mechanisms, from agentic workflows to disaggregated serving, no longer fit the monolithic simulation pipeline that existing simulators assume. Each new mechanism therefore demands an invasive rewrite, leaving a widening development gap between deployed serving systems and the simulators that model them. To close this gap, we present Simthesizer, a framework that realizes agent-driven simulator development. Simthesizer introduces a composable simulator infrastructure that uniformly expresses the complete serving workflow, including the control decisions that coordinate it, and realizes it as a unified dynamic graph in Simthesizer simulator. Synthesizer agent, a harnessed coding agent, then lowers natural-language feature requests onto this abstraction under simulator-specific guardrails and fidelity validation, evolving one shared simulator instead of building a new one for every feature. Under the same coding agent and harnesses, extensions built on Simthesizer follow a vLLM-based real system with 2.51% average throughput error, versus 6.03% for extensions built on existing simulators. On identical workloads, Simthesizer also simulates up to 284.96x and 23.19x faster than two state-of-the-art simulators, LLMServingSim2.0 and Vidur, respectively.

ASAREE: An Analytical Sandbox for Agentic AI Research, Engineering, and Experimentation

Summary Agentic AI platforms enable the engineering of autonomous workflows but are not designed for experimentation and hypothesis testing. ASAREE (Analytical Sandbox for Agentic AI Research, Engineering, and Experimentation), is an open-source platform to address this gap. ASAREE creates agents, connects to MCP servers and tools, and designs factorial experiments through a visual interface or Python SDK. It records a full provenance trace for every run and routes all model calls through a provider-agnostic bridge that supports local deployments, ensuring data privacy. As a use-case, we use ASAREE to evaluate key design choices in a mutli-agent machine learning pipeline. Across a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, more advanced models, greater reasoning effort, and critic agent use significantly increased compute time, token use, cost, and feature count without improving predictive performance. The lowest-cost baseline, Claude Sonnet 5 with medium effort and no critic, achieved the highest mean PR AUC while Claude Opus 5 with extra high effort and a critic agent cost 15.5× more (USD) and ran 13.1× longer while performing worse on average. These findings highlight ASAREE as a robust framework for evaluating agentic system performance and resource efficiency. Availability and implementation ASAREE is available on GitHub at: https://github.com/EpistasisLab/ASAREE. Contact jason.moore@csmc.edu Supplementary Information Supplementary information is available at https://github.com/EpistasisLab/ASAREE/tree/main/publications/bioinformatics

AgentSLABench: Evaluating and Benchmarking Agentic Systems Under Resource Constraints

We present AgentSLABench, a resource-aware evaluation framework for autonomous AI agents that measures correctness alongside latency, cost, compute, memory, and network usage under declared resource budgets. Unlike standard benchmarks that report only accuracy, AgentSLABench produces a multi-dimensional profile per agent per task - the same way systems profilers (perf, pprof, cProfile) measure resource consumption of code, but extended with task correctness as a first-class dimension. AgentSLABench provides 16 task environments across 6 categories (5 core: multi-hop QA, retail substitution, code generation, web shopping, travel planning; 11 extended) with isolated Docker containers, declared CPU/memory/time/network budgets, sealed test sets with SHA256 hashes, and a standardized profiling protocol. We profile 5 general-purpose baseline agents (ReAct, PlanAndSolve, Reflexion, CoT, Random) plus 4 task-specialized agents, finding that specialized agents achieve 100% success on 3/5 core tasks (fact_qa, web_shopping, travel_planning) and 66.7-83.3% on retail and code_gen, while general baselines fail entirely on 4/5 domain tasks. Crucially, we report the Efficiency-Adjusted Success Rate (EASR) - success weighted by resource consumption relative to declared budgets - revealing that high accuracy at unbounded cost is not production-viable. We release the full infrastructure, sealed test sets, and profiling results to enable reproducible, resource-aware agent evaluation.